// https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2996
    // no data, just testing that there's no StackOverflowException
    assertEquals(-1, tenMillionEmptySources().read());
  }

  public void testReadArray_noStackOverflow() throws IOException {
    // https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2996
    // no data, just testing that there's no StackOverflowException
    assertEquals(-1, tenMillionEmptySources().read(new byte[1]));

	instructions["JGE"] = x86.AJGE  /* greater than or equal (signed) (SF = OF) */
	instructions["JGT"] = x86.AJGT  /* greater than (signed) (ZF = 0 && SF = OF) */
	instructions["JHI"] = x86.AJHI  /* higher (unsigned) (CF = 0 && ZF = 0) */
	instructions["JHS"] = x86.AJCC  /* alternate */
	instructions["JL"] = x86.AJLT   /* alternate */
	instructions["JLE"] = x86.AJLE  /* less than or equal (signed) (ZF = 1 || SF != OF) */

   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */
  private final Equivalence<? super T> equivalence;

    CharSource reader =
        new CharSource() {
          @Override
          public Reader openStream() throws IOException {
            if (counter[0]++ != 0) {
              throw new IllegalStateException("More than one source open");
            }
            return new FilterReader(source.openStream()) {
              @Override
              public void close() throws IOException {
                super.close();

      return actions[random.nextInt(actions.length)];
    }
  }

  /**
   * Test that the hash function contains no funnels. A funnel is a situation where a set of input
   * (key) bits 'affects' a strictly smaller set of output bits. Funneling is bad because it can
   * result in more-than-ideal collisions for a non-uniformly distributed key space. In practice,

    Preconditions.checkNotNull(buffer);
    /*
     * This code performs one System.nanoTime() more than necessary, and in return, the time to
     * execute Queue#drainTo is not added *on top* of waiting for the timeout (which could make
     * the timeout arbitrarily inaccurate, given a queue that is slow to drain).
     */
    long deadline = System.nanoTime() + unit.toNanos(timeout);
    int added = 0;

		srvRecord.Key = strings.TrimSuffix(srvRecord.Key, srvRecord.Host)

		// Skip non-bucket entry like for a key
		// /skydns/net/miniocloud/10.0.0.1 that may exist as
		// dns entry for the server (rather than the bucket
		// itself).
		if srvRecord.Key == "" {
			continue
		}

		srvRecord.Key = msgUnPath(srvRecord.Key)
		srvRecords = append(srvRecords, srvRecord)
	}

   * generates a synthetic method for the body of the lambda, the actual method calls that Animal
   * Sniffer is flagging don't appear inside toImmutableSortedMultiset but rather inside that
   * synthetic method. By moving those calls to a named method, we're able to apply
   * @IgnoreJRERequirement somewhere that it will help.
   */

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {

   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in add(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getAddNullSupportedMethod() {