*       anything about how the property is tested. To find out, read the code.
 *   <li>These tests are "conformance tests", and do not attempt to test throughput, latency,
 *       scalability or other performance factors (see the separate "jtreg" tests for a set intended
 *       to check these for the most central aspects of functionality.) So, most tests use the
 *       smallest sensible numbers of threads, collection sizes, etc needed to check basic

 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*
 * Some of the annotations below were added after we released our separate
 * com.google.guava:listenablefuture:1.0 artifact. (For more on that artifact, see
 * https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v27.0) This means that the copy of ListenableFuture

<!DOCTYPE suppressions PUBLIC
        "-//Puppy Crawl//DTD Suppressions 1.1//EN"
        "http://www.puppycrawl.com/dtds/suppressions_1_1.dtd">

<suppressions>
  <!-- On Windows, Checkstyle matches files using \ path separator -->

  <!-- These files are generated by ANTLR so its silly to hold them to our rules. -->

identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Library,
and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in
themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those
sections when you distribute them as separate works.  But when you
distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based
on the Library, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of

        <configuration>
          <!-- Passing `-subpackages com.google.common` breaks things, so we explicitly exclude everything else instead. -->
          <!-- excludePackageNames requires specification of packages separately from "all subpackages".
               https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-584 -->
          <excludePackageNames>

## FAQ

> Why is this change needed?

Before, there were two separate mechanisms - S3 objects got encrypted using a KMS,
if present, and the IAM / configuration data got encrypted with the root credentials.
Now, MinIO encrypts IAM / configuration and S3 objects with a KMS, if present. This

            // attribute name
            scanner.mark();
            scanner.find(END_ATTRIBUTE_NAME);
            String attrName = scanner.region();

            // separator
            scanner.skip(ATTRIBUTE_SEPARATOR);

            // value
            char quote = scanner.getFirst();
            scanner.next();
            StringBuilder attrValue = new StringBuilder();

   * intentionally, so there is no other way to clean up these threads. (The better solution,
   * though, would be to run the tests that use TestThread in separate VMs so that their threads
   * don't hang around during other tests.)
   */
  @Override
  public void tearDown() throws Exception {
    try {
      Thread.class.getMethod("stop").invoke(this);
      join();

    @SuppressWarnings({
      "unused",
      /*
       * Since reflection can't tell the difference between <T> and <T extends Object>, it doesn't
       * make a ton of sense to have a separate tests for each. But having tests for each doesn't
       * really hurt anything, and maybe it will serve a purpose in a future in which Java has a
       * built-in nullness feature?
       */
      "ExtendsObject",

                    "<link href=\"https://fonts.cdnfonts.com/css/dejavu-sans-mono\" rel=\"stylesheet\">"
            );

            // TODO: This would be better to model as separate options
            options.addStringOption("Xdoclint:syntax,html", "-quiet");
            // TODO: This breaks the provider