var wg sync.WaitGroup
	for i, pool := range z.serverPools {
		wg.Add(1)
		go func(i int, pool *erasureSets, opts ObjectOptions) {
			defer wg.Done()
			// remember the pool index, we may sort the slice original index might be lost.
			pinfo := PoolObjInfo{
				Index: i,
			}
			// do not remove this check as it can lead to inconsistencies
			// for all callers of bucket replication.
			if !opts.MetadataChg {

### Bug or Regression

- Fixes a race condition in the iptables mode of kube-proxy in 1.27 and later
  that could result in some updates getting lost (e.g., when a service gets a
  new endpoint, the rules for the new endpoint might not be added until
  much later). ([#122815](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/122815), [@wedaly](https://github.com/wedaly)) [SIG Network]

	// cycle until we can safely update the in-memory cache.
	//
	// An in-memory cache must be replaced only if we know for sure that the
	// values loaded from disk are not stale. They might be stale if the
	// cached.updatedAt is more recent than the refresh cycle began.
	if cache.updatedAt.Before(loadedAt) || firstTime {
		// No one has updated anything since the config was loaded,

     * Even though it's weird to pass a defaultValue that is null, some callers do so. Those who
     * pass a literal "null" should probably just use `get`, but I would expect other callers to
     * pass an expression that *might* be null. This could happen with:
     *
     * - a `getFooOrDefault(@Nullable Foo defaultValue)` method that returns
     *   `map.getOrDefault(FOO_KEY, defaultValue)`
     *

		parts:            oi.Parts,
		partIndex:        partStart,
	}

	// In case of SSE-C, we have to decrypt the OEK using the client-provided key.
	// In case of a SSE-C server-side copy, the client might provide two keys,
	// one for the source and one for the target. This reader is the source.
	var ssecClientKey []byte
	if crypto.SSEC.IsEncrypted(oi.UserDefined) {
		if copySource && crypto.SSECopy.IsRequested(h) {

     * Even though it's weird to pass a defaultValue that is null, some callers do so. Those who
     * pass a literal "null" should probably just use `get`, but I would expect other callers to
     * pass an expression that *might* be null. This could happen with:
     *
     * - a `getFooOrDefault(@Nullable Foo defaultValue)` method that returns
     *   `map.getOrDefault(FOO_KEY, defaultValue)`
     *

- Overall, enable the feature of `PreferNominatedNode` will  improve the performance of scheduling where preemption might frequently happen, but in theory, enable the feature of `PreferNominatedNode`, the pod might not be scheduled to the best candidate node in the cluster. ([#93179](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/93179), [@chendave](https://github.com/chendave)) [SIG Scheduling and Testing]

 *
 * <tr><td ><code>smb1://angus/</code></td><td>
 * This references only a server. The behavior of some methods is different
 * in this context(e.g. you cannot <code>delete</code> a server) however
 * as you might expect the <code>list</code> method will list the available
 * shares on this server.
 * </td></tr>
 *
 * <tr><td ><code>smb1://myworkgroup/</code></td><td>

  which the scheduler might miss some updates for the Pods rejected by NodeUnschedulable plugin and put the Pods in the queue for a longer time than needed. ([#127427](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/127427), [@sanposhiho](https://github.com/sanposhiho)) [SIG Scheduling]
- Fixes the bug in PodTopologySpread that only happens with QHint enabled, 

	// FIXME: network calls made in this manner such as one goroutine per node,
	// can easily eat into the internode bandwidth. This function would be mostly
	// TX saturating, however there are situations where a RX might also saturate.
	// To avoid these problems we must split the work at scale. With 1000 node
	// setup becoming a reality we must try to shard the work properly such as