two drive failure whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects incrementally. Storage servers once deployed should not require drive replacement or healing for the lifetime of the server. MinIO's erasure...

import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests for {@link AbstractListeningExecutorService}.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class AbstractListeningExecutorServiceTest extends TestCase {

  public void testSubmit() throws Exception {
    /*

import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests for {@link AbstractListeningExecutorService}.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class AbstractListeningExecutorServiceTest extends TestCase {

  public void testSubmit() throws Exception {
    /*

 *       typically implemented by opening a stream using one of the methods in the first category,
 *       doing something and finally closing the stream or channel that was opened.
 * </ul>
 *
 * @since 14.0
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
public abstract class ByteSink {

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected ByteSink() {}

  /**

 *       typically implemented by opening a stream using one of the methods in the first category,
 *       doing something and finally closing the stream or channel that was opened.
 * </ul>
 *
 * @since 14.0
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
public abstract class ByteSink {

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected ByteSink() {}

  /**

 * Generates tests of all methods on a {@code ByteSink} given various inputs written to it as well
 * as sub-suites for testing the {@code CharSink} view in the same way.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // TODO(b/230620681): Make this available (even though we won't run it).
@NullUnmarked
public class ByteSinkTester extends SourceSinkTester<ByteSink, byte[], ByteSinkFactory> {

 * Generates tests of all methods on a {@code ByteSink} given various inputs written to it as well
 * as sub-suites for testing the {@code CharSink} view in the same way.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // TODO(b/230620681): Make this available (even though we won't run it).
@NullUnmarked
public class ByteSinkTester extends SourceSinkTester<ByteSink, byte[], ByteSinkFactory> {

# network, which has the MTU of 1460,
# due to 40 bytes being reserved for GCP's internal usage.
# Note, an invalid sub-interface name will lead to an obscure error, e.g.:
# "The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect."
# In such cases, check that the name of the sub-interface is valid:
# `netsh interface show interface`
RUN netsh interface ipv4 set subinterface \"vEthernet (Ethernet)\" mtu=1460 store=persistent

 *
 * <p>Two subscribers are equivalent when they refer to the same method on the same object (not
 * class). This property is used to ensure that no subscriber method is registered more than once.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
class Subscriber {

  /** Creates a {@code Subscriber} for {@code method} on {@code listener}. */
  static Subscriber create(EventBus bus, Object listener, Method method) {

import com.google.common.collect.Iterators;
import java.util.Iterator;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests for {@link SubscriberRegistry}.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class SubscriberRegistryTest extends TestCase {

  private final SubscriberRegistry registry = new SubscriberRegistry(new EventBus());

  public void testRegister() {