# ---------------
constraints.AssertFalse.message = {item} must be false.
constraints.AssertTrue.message = {item} must be true.
constraints.DecimalMax.message = {item} must be less than {value}.
constraints.DecimalMin.message = {item} must be greater than {value}.
constraints.Digits.message = {item} must be a number. (expected: <number>.<number>)
constraints.Future.message = {item} must be a future value.

# ---------------
constraints.AssertFalse.message = {item} must be false.
constraints.AssertTrue.message = {item} must be true.
constraints.DecimalMax.message = {item} must be less than {value}.
constraints.DecimalMin.message = {item} must be greater than {value}.
constraints.Digits.message = {item} must be a number. (expected: <number>.<number>)
constraints.Future.message = {item} must be a future value.

     * the full DOMAIN\name form of the account will be
     * returned (e.g. MYDOM\alice or MYDOM\Domain Users).
     * If the SID has been resolved but it is is a domain SID,
     * only the domain name will be returned (e.g. MYDOM).
     * If the SID has been resolved but it is a builtin account,
     * only the name component will be returned (e.g. SYSTEM).
     * If the sid cannot be resolved the numeric representation from

   *
   * With regular HTTP calls the request always completes sending before the response may begin
   * receiving. With duplex the request and response may be interleaved! That is, request body bytes
   * may be sent after response headers or body bytes have been received.
   *
   * Though any call may be initiated as a duplex call, only web servers that are specially
   * designed for this nonstandard interaction will use it. As of 2019-01, the only widely-used

    if (finalizableReferenceClass == null) {
      /*
       * FinalizableReference's class loader was reclaimed. While there's a chance that other
       * finalizable references could be enqueued subsequently (at which point the class loader
       * would be resurrected by virtue of us having a strong reference to it), we should pretty
       * much just shut down and make sure we don't keep it alive any longer than necessary.
       */

        // When
        NetbiosName localName = nameServiceClient.getLocalName();

        // Then
        assertNotNull(localName, "Local name should not be null");
        assertTrue(localName.getName().length() > 0, "Local name should not be empty");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should get unknown name")
    void testGetUnknownName() {
        // When

## |:-------- ## | rootUser | rootUser | ## | rootPassword | rootPassword | ## ## All mentioned variables will be ignored in values file. ## .data.rootUser and .data.rootPassword are mandatory, ## others depend on enabled status of corresponding sections. existingSecret: "" ## Directory on the MinIO pof certsPath: "/etc/minio/certs/" configPathmc: "/etc/minio/mc/" ## Path where PV would be mounted on the MinIO Pod mountPath: "/export" ## Override the root directory which the minio server should serve...

     *
     * @param field the field (must not be {@literal null})
     * @param target the object whose field is to be modified; {@literal null} if the field is static
     * @param value the new value for the field of the {@code target} object
     * @throws IllegalAccessRuntimeException if the field cannot be accessed
     * @see Field#set(Object, Object)
     */

 *       under all environments. We could fight this by fully qualifying the annotation, but the
 *       result will be verbose and attention-grabbing.
 *   <li>We need to be careful about how we suppress {@code suite()} methods in {@code common.io}.
 *       The generated suite for {@code FooTest} ends up containing {@code FooTest} itself plus some

 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive