* analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.
   * (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation
   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying

		writeErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(ErrAdminLDAPNotEnabled), r.URL)
		return
	}

	if r.ContentLength > maxEConfigJSONSize || r.ContentLength == -1 {
		// More than maxConfigSize bytes were available
		writeErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(ErrAdminConfigTooLarge), r.URL)
		return
	}

	// Ensure body content type is opaque to ensure that request body has not

     * @return true if enumeration is done, false otherwise
     */
    protected abstract boolean isDone();

    /**
     * Fetches more entries from the server.
     *
     * @return true if more entries were fetched, false otherwise
     * @throws CIFSException if an error occurs during fetching
     */
    protected abstract boolean fetchMore() throws CIFSException;

    /**
     * Gets the current batch of results.

        fail(
            "contents were not equal and in the same order: "
                + "expected = "
                + expected
                + ", actual = "
                + actual);
      }
    }

    if (expectedIter.hasNext() || actualIter.hasNext()) {
      // actual either had too few or too many elements
      fail(
          "contents were not equal and in the same order: "

   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.
   * (And even if annotations on local variables were permitted as an optional hint, no annotation
   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying

    expectUnchanged();
    assertTrue(collection.contains(e0()));
  }

  /*
   * AbstractCollection fails the removeAll(null) test when the subject
   * collection is empty, but we'd still like to test removeAll(null) when we
   * can. We split the test into empty and non-empty cases. This allows us to
   * suppress only the former.
   */

  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)

    latch.countDown();

    exec.shutdown();
    exec.awaitTermination(100, MILLISECONDS);
  }

  /**
   * Tests that all listeners complete, even if they were added before or after the future was
   * finishing. Also acts as a concurrency test to make sure the locking is done correctly when a
   * future is finishing so that no listeners can be lost.
   */

        buffer[bufferIndex + 36] = 0x00; // reserved

        int bytesRead = response.readParameterWordsWireFormat(buffer, bufferIndex);

        // Verify the correct number of bytes were read (37 bytes total)
        assertEquals(37, bytesRead);

        // Verify values through reflection

	w.err = err
}

func (w *writerAt) Close() (err error) {
	switch {
	case len(w.buffer) > 0:
		err = errors.New("some file segments were not flushed from the queue")
		_ = w.w.CloseWithError(err)
	case w.err != nil:
		// No need to close here since both pipes were
		// closing inside TransferError()
		err = w.err
	default:
		err = w.w.Close()
	}
	for i := range w.buffer {
		delete(w.buffer, i)
	}

   * awaitFullGc() is not quite as reliable a way to ensure calling of a specific finalize method as
   * the more direct await* methods, but should be reliable enough in practice to avoid flakiness of
   * this test. (And if it isn't, we'd like to know about it first!)
   */
  public void testAwaitFullGc() {
    CountDownLatch finalizerRan = new CountDownLatch(1);
    WeakReference<Object> ref =
        new WeakReference<Object>(