* the problem.
 *
 */
public interface ModelProblem extends BuilderProblem {

    /**
     * Enumeration of model versions that can be validated.
     * These versions correspond to different levels of validation that can be applied
     * during model building, based on the POM schema version.
     * <p>
     * The validation levels are cumulative, with higher versions including all validations

    void constructorWithMockAndx() {
        // Create a mock ServerMessageBlock
        ServerMessageBlock mockAndx = mock(ServerMessageBlock.class);
        mockAndx.command = (byte) 0x2E; // Set a different command value (e.g., SMB_COM_READ_ANDX)

        // Create SmbComLogoffAndX with the mock
        SmbComLogoffAndX msg = new SmbComLogoffAndX(mockAndx);

        // Verify the object was created successfully

  }

  // In the unittest, create each ordered factory with its own set of lock
  // graph nodes (as opposed to using the static per-Enum map) to avoid
  // conflicts across different test runs.
  private <E extends Enum<E>>
      CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E> newInstanceWithExplicitOrdering(
          Class<E> enumClass, Policy policy) {

  }

  // In the unittest, create each ordered factory with its own set of lock
  // graph nodes (as opposed to using the static per-Enum map) to avoid
  // conflicts across different test runs.
  private <E extends Enum<E>>
      CycleDetectingLockFactory.WithExplicitOrdering<E> newInstanceWithExplicitOrdering(
          Class<E> enumClass, Policy policy) {

     2. Build a Gradle distribution with this hash as a version + fixed timestamp -> dogfood-first
     3. Build a Gradle distribution using dogfood-first with this hash as a version + fixed timestamp different from the one above -> dogfood-second
     4. Use dogfood-second to run a Gradle build which runs tests.

     */
        val dogfoodTimestamp1 = "19800101010101+0000"
        val dogfoodTimestamp2 = "19800202020202+0000"

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~

 *
 * <p>Like any other {@code Map<Class, Object>}, this map may contain entries for primitive types,
 * and a primitive type and its corresponding wrapper type may map to different values.
 *
 * @param <B> the common supertype that all entries must share; often this is simply {@link Object}
 * @author Ben Yu
 * @since 13.0
 */
@DoNotMock("Use ImmutableTypeToInstanceMap or MutableTypeToInstanceMap")

      version="${RELEASE}" \
      release="${RELEASE}" \
      summary="MinIO is a High Performance Object Storage, API compatible with Amazon S3 cloud storage service." \
      description="MinIO object storage is fundamentally different. Designed for performance and the S3 API, it is 100% open-source. MinIO is ideal for large, private cloud environments with stringent security requirements and delivers mission-critical availability across a diverse range of workloads."

      version="${RELEASE}" \
      release="${RELEASE}" \
      summary="MinIO is a High Performance Object Storage, API compatible with Amazon S3 cloud storage service." \
      description="MinIO object storage is fundamentally different. Designed for performance and the S3 API, it is 100% open-source. MinIO is ideal for large, private cloud environments with stringent security requirements and delivers mission-critical availability across a diverse range of workloads."