setEventStreamHeaders(w)

	// Listen Publisher and peer-listen-client uses nonblocking send and hence does not wait for slow receivers.
	// Use buffered channel to take care of burst sends or slow w.Write()
	mergeCh := make(chan []byte, globalAPIConfig.getRequestsPoolCapacity()*len(globalEndpoints.Hostnames()))
	localCh := make(chan event.Event, globalAPIConfig.getRequestsPoolCapacity())

    try {
      RandomAccessFile raf =
          closer.register(new RandomAccessFile(file, mode == MapMode.READ_ONLY ? "r" : "rw"));
      FileChannel channel = closer.register(raf.getChannel());
      return channel.map(mode, 0, size == -1 ? channel.size() : size);
    } catch (Throwable e) {
      throw closer.rethrow(e);
    } finally {
      closer.close();
    }
  }

  /**

            return 1;
        }

        @Override
        public void setRequestCredits(int credits) {
            this.requestCredits = credits;
        }

        @Override
        public boolean isCancel() {
            return false;
        }

        // Methods from Message interface
        @Override
        public void retainPayload() {
            this.retainPayload = true;
        }

///

## Reduce duplication { #reduce-duplication }

Reducing code duplication is one of the core ideas in **FastAPI**.

As code duplication increments the chances of bugs, security issues, code desynchronization issues (when you update in one place but not in the others), etc.

And these models are all sharing a lot of the data and duplicating attribute names and types.

        String maxVersion = props.getProperty("jcifs.smb.client.maxVersion");
        if (minVersion != null || maxVersion != null) {
            initProtocolVersions(minVersion, maxVersion);
        }

        // Multi-Channel Configuration
        value = props.getProperty("jcifs.smb.client.useMultiChannel");
        if (value != null) {
            this.useMultiChannelExplicitlySet = true;

      encodings[ 0x15] = encoding // Negative Acknowledgment
      encodings[ 0x16] = encoding // Synchronous idle
      encodings[ 0x17] = encoding // End of Transmission Block
      encodings[ 0x18] = encoding // Cancel
      encodings[ 0x19] = encoding // End of Medium
      encodings[ 0x1a] = encoding // Substitute
      encodings[ 0x1b] = encoding // Escape
      encodings[ 0x1c] = encoding // File Separator

      assertThat(timer.elapsed(MILLISECONDS)).isAtLeast(10L);

      // If even the first one wasn't there, clean up so that the next test doesn't see an element.
      producerThread.cancel(true);
      producer.doneProducing.await();
      if (drained == 0) {
        q.poll(); // not necessarily there if producer was interrupted
      }
    }
  }

		cacheStore:       cacheStore,
		namer:            namer,
		initialized:      make(chan struct{}),
	}
	// When the schema initialization is completed, the channel will be closed
	defer close(schema.initialized)

	// Load exist schema cache, return if exists
	if v, ok := cacheStore.Load(schemaCacheKey); ok {
		s := v.(*Schema)

So, we declare the event handler function with standard `def` instead of `async def`.

///

### `startup` and `shutdown` together { #startup-and-shutdown-together }

There's a high chance that the logic for your *startup* and *shutdown* is connected, you might want to start something and then finish it, acquire a resource and then release it, etc.

Mas `open()` não usa `async` e `await`.

Então, nós declaramos uma função de manipulação de evento com o padrão `def` ao invés de `async def`.

///

### `startup` e `shutdown` juntos

Há uma grande chance que a lógica para sua *inicialização* e *encerramento* esteja conectada, você pode querer iniciar alguma coisa e então finalizá-la, adquirir um recurso e então liberá-lo, etc.