return encoded_jwt


async def get_current_user(token: str = Depends(oauth2_scheme)):
    credentials_exception = HTTPException(
        status_code=status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED,
        detail="Could not validate credentials",
        headers={"WWW-Authenticate": "Bearer"},
    )
    try:
        payload = jwt.decode(token, SECRET_KEY, algorithms=[ALGORITHM])
        username = payload.get("sub")

    return encoded_jwt


async def get_current_user(token: str = Depends(oauth2_scheme)):
    credentials_exception = HTTPException(
        status_code=status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED,
        detail="Could not validate credentials",
        headers={"WWW-Authenticate": "Bearer"},
    )
    try:
        payload = jwt.decode(token, SECRET_KEY, algorithms=[ALGORITHM])
        username = payload.get("sub")

			// The set of RVV special operand names and the set of CSR special operands
			// names are disjoint and so can safely share a single namespace. However,
			// it's possible that a future update to the CSRs in inst.go could introduce
			// a conflict. This check ensures that such a conflict does not go
			// unnoticed.
			if _, ok := riscv64SpecialOperand[csrName]; ok {
				panic(fmt.Sprintf("riscv64 special operand %q redefined", csrName))
			}

            attribute(minified)
        }
        // It would be nice if we could be more selective about which variants to apply this to.
        // TODO https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/11831#issuecomment-580686994
        artifactTypes.getByName("jar") {
            attributes.attribute(minified, java.lang.Boolean.FALSE)
        }
        /*

          // caught and forwarded to the service the task would stop executing but the service would
          // have no idea.
          // TODO(lukes): consider building everything in terms of ListenableScheduledFuture then
          // the AbstractService could monitor the future directly. Rescheduling is still hard...
          // but it would help with some of these lock ordering issues.
          scheduleFailure = e;

      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

     *  The implementation of this is a little slow, since it creates
     *  a number of objects each time it is called.  This could be optimized
     *  to keep the same objects around, but then thread-safety issues would arise.
     *
     *  @param contextNode The node to start searching from.
     *  @param expression A valid XPath string.

/// note | Technical Details

You could also use `from starlette.middleware.cors import CORSMiddleware`.

     * execute Queue#drainTo is not added *on top* of waiting for the timeout (which could make
     * the timeout arbitrarily inaccurate, given a queue that is slow to drain).
     */
    long deadline = System.nanoTime() + unit.toNanos(timeout);
    int added = 0;
    while (added < numElements) {
      // we could rely solely on #poll, but #drainTo might be more efficient when there are multiple

    tests themselves and not the code being tested that needs that access, though there's no
    obvious way to ensure that.

    We could consider arranging things so that only the tests we know need this would get
    the add-opens. Right now that doesn't seem worth the effort, though.
    -->
    <test.add.opens>
      --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED