* {@link BuilderProblem.Severity#WARNING} and below are reported here. Problems with a higher severity level cause
     * the settings builder to fail with a {@link ToolchainsBuilderException}.
     *
     * @return the problems that were encountered during the settings building, can be empty but never {@code null}
     */
    @Nonnull

        logger.info(content);
        assertTrue(content.contains("テスト"));
    }

    public void test_getText_null() {
        try {
            textExtractor.getText(null, null);
            fail();
        } catch (final CrawlerSystemException e) {
            // NOP
        }
    }

            field.setAccessible(true);
            long actualInterval = (Long) field.get(dataIndexHelper);
            assertEquals(interval, actualInterval);
        } catch (Exception e) {
            fail("Failed to verify crawlingExecutionInterval: " + e.getMessage());
        }
    }

    public void test_setCrawlerPriority() {
        int priority = Thread.NORM_PRIORITY; // Use normal priority for tests

        assertThrows(
                ChecksumFailedException.class,
                () -> wagonManager.getArtifact(artifact, repo, null, false),
                "Checksum verification did not fail");

        wagon.clearExpectedContent();
        wagon.addExpectedContent("path", "lower-case-checksum");
        wagon.addExpectedContent("path.md5", "50b2cf50a103a965efac62b983035cac");

        // Create new storage with different salt
        SecureCredentialStorage storage2 = new SecureCredentialStorage(masterPassword.clone());

        try {
            // Should fail because keys are different
            assertThrows(GeneralSecurityException.class, () -> {
                storage2.decryptCredentials(encrypted);

fi

./mc admin policy remove minio3 projecta

sleep 10
./mc admin policy info minio1 projecta
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
	echo "expecting the command to fail, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi

./mc admin policy info minio2 projecta
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
	echo "expecting the command to fail, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi

./mc admin policy create minio1 projecta ./docs/site-replication/rw.json
sleep 5

    }
  }

  private static void assertIntact(MinMaxPriorityQueue<?> q) {
    if (!q.isIntact()) {
      fail("State " + Arrays.toString(q.toArray()));
    }
  }

  private static void assertIntactUsingSeed(long seed, MinMaxPriorityQueue<?> q) {
    if (!q.isIntact()) {
      fail("Using seed " + seed + ". State " + Arrays.toString(q.toArray()));
    }
  }

    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

  /*
   * If you do this test from common.eventbus.EventBusTest, it doesn't actually test the behavior.
   * That is, even if exactly the same method works from inside the common.eventbus package tests,
   * it can fail here.
   */
  public void testAnonymous() {
    AtomicReference<String> holder = new AtomicReference<>();
    AtomicInteger deliveries = new AtomicInteger();
    EventBus bus = new EventBus();
    bus.register(

            // Just verify the method exists, don't actually call it
            crawlerEngineClient.getClass().getMethod("close");
            assertTrue(true);
        } catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
            fail("close method should exist");
        }
    }

    // Test toString method
    public void test_toString() {
        // Test that toString returns a non-null value