// Normal execution.
	for {
		r1, _, err := r.ReadRune()
		if err != nil {
			if err != io.EOF {
				t.Error("unexpected error on ReadRune:", err)
			}
			break
		}
		got += string(r1)
		// Put it back and read it again.
		if err = r.UnreadRune(); err != nil {
			t.Fatal("unexpected error on UnreadRune:", err)
		}
		r2, _, err := r.ReadRune()
		if err != nil {

      if (changes == null) {
        // The trickled element is still after index.
        return new MoveDesc<>(actualLastElement, toTrickle);
      } else {
        // The trickled element is back before index, but the replaced element
        // has now been moved after index.
        return new MoveDesc<>(actualLastElement, changes.replaced);
      }
    }

   * Future}.
   *
   * <p>Usage example:
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * ListenableFuture<Integer> fetchCounterFuture = ...;
   *
   * // Falling back to a zero counter in case an exception happens when
   * // processing the RPC to fetch counters.
   * ListenableFuture<Integer> faultTolerantFuture = Futures.catching(

- The job controller back-off logic is now decoupled from workqueue. In case of parallelism > 1, if there are multiple new failures in a reconciliation cycle, all the failures are taken into account to compute the back-off. Previously, the back-off kicked in for all types of failures; with this change, only pod failures are taken into account. If the back-off limits exceeds, the job is marked as failed immediately; before this change, the...

   * transitionService in the wrong order due to a race. Due to the fact that it is a race this test
   * isn't guaranteed to expose the issue, but it is at least likely to become flaky if the race
   * sneaks back in, and in this case flaky means something is definitely wrong.
   *
   * <p>Before the bug was fixed this test would fail at least 30% of the time.
   */
  public void testTransitionRace() throws TimeoutException {

## Replica Modification sync

-   If the PR passes all the quality checks then we go ahead and assign a
    reviewer.
-   If the PR didn't meet the validation criteria, we request for additional
    changes to be made to PR to pass quality checks and send it back or on a
    rare occasion we may reject it.

**3. Review**

-   For a valid PR, reviewer (person familiar with the code/functionality)
    checks if the PR looks good or needs additional changes.

     explicitly and finally terminates Your grants, and (b) on an ongoing basis,
     if such Contributor fails to notify You of the non-compliance by some
     reasonable means prior to 60 days after You have come back into compliance.
     Moreover, Your grants from a particular Contributor are reinstated on an
     ongoing basis if such Contributor notifies You of the non-compliance by

     explicitly and finally terminates Your grants, and (b) on an ongoing
     basis, if such Contributor fails to notify You of the non-compliance by
     some reasonable means prior to 60 days after You have come back into
     compliance. Moreover, Your grants from a particular Contributor are
     reinstated on an ongoing basis if such Contributor notifies You of the
     non-compliance by some reasonable means, this is the first time You have

  }

  public void testToByteArrayAndFromByteArrayRoundTrip() {
    for (Stats stats : ALL_STATS) {
      byte[] statsByteArray = stats.toByteArray();

      // Round trip to byte array and back
      assertThat(Stats.fromByteArray(statsByteArray)).isEqualTo(stats);
    }
  }

  public void testFromByteArray_withNullInputThrowsNullPointerException() {