return
			}
			for policyName, policy := range allPolicies {
				if policy.IsEmpty() {
					err = globalIAMSys.DeletePolicy(ctx, policyName, true)
					removed.Policies = append(removed.Policies, policyName)
				} else {
					_, err = globalIAMSys.SetPolicy(ctx, policyName, policy)
					added.Policies = append(added.Policies, policyName)
				}
				if err != nil {

 *
 * <p>For instance, if <i>steps</i> is 5, one example sequence that will be tested is:
 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive

	globalCertsDir, err = newConfigDir(certsDir, certsSet, defaultCertsDir.Get)
	logger.FatalIf(err, "Unable to initialize the certs directory")

	// Remove this code when we deprecate and remove config-dir.
	// This code is to make sure we inherit from the config-dir
	// option if certs-dir is not provided.
	if !certsSet && configSet {

   * comparison to determine equality of values. This technically violates the specifications of the
   * methods {@link Map#containsValue containsValue}, {@link ConcurrentMap#remove(Object, Object)
   * remove(Object, Object)} and {@link ConcurrentMap#replace(Object, Object, Object) replace(K, V,
   * V)}, and may not be what you expect.
   *
   * @throws IllegalStateException if the value strength was already set

   * {@code get(null)}, {@code keySet().contains(null)} or {@code remove(null)}.
   */
  ALLOWS_NULL_KEY_QUERIES,
  ALLOWS_NULL_KEYS(ALLOWS_NULL_KEY_QUERIES),
  /**
   * The map does not throw {@code NullPointerException} on calls such as {@code
   * containsValue(null)}, {@code values().contains(null)} or {@code values().remove(null)}.
   */
  ALLOWS_NULL_VALUE_QUERIES,
  ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES(ALLOWS_NULL_VALUE_QUERIES),

  public void testRemoveAtIndex_unsupported() {
    assertThrows(UnsupportedOperationException.class, () -> getList().remove(0));
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @ListFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE_WITH_INDEX)
  public void testRemoveAtIndex_negative() {
    assertThrows(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> getList().remove(-1));
    expectUnchanged();
  }

  @ListFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE_WITH_INDEX)

        // Test normal string without control characters
        assertEquals("test", InputValidator.sanitizeForLogging("test"));

        // Test removal of control characters (they are removed, not replaced with spaces)
        assertEquals("teststring", InputValidator.sanitizeForLogging("test\0string"));
        assertEquals("teststring", InputValidator.sanitizeForLogging("test\nstring"));

    assertThrows(UnsupportedOperationException.class, () -> collection.remove(e0()));
    expectUnchanged();
    assertTrue("remove(present) should not remove the element", collection.contains(e0()));
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  public void testRemove_unsupportedNotPresent() {
    try {
      assertFalse(
          "remove(notPresent) should return false or throw UnsupportedOperationException",

      putNext(this, next);
    }

    void unpark() {
      // This is racy with removeWaiter. The consequence of the race is that we may spuriously call
      // unpark even though the thread has already removed itself from the list. But even if we did
      // use a CAS, that race would still exist (it would just be ever so slightly smaller).
      Thread w = thread;
      if (w != null) {
        thread = null;

    map.put(one, two);
    map.remove(one);
    assertNotified(listener, one, two, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT);

    map.put(two, three);
    map.remove(two, three);
    assertNotified(listener, two, three, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT);

    map.put(three, four);
    Iterator<?> i = map.entrySet().iterator();
    i.next();
    i.remove();
    assertNotified(listener, three, four, RemovalCause.EXPLICIT);