Es ist mehrmals passiert, dass es PRs mit drei, fünf oder mehr Zustimmungen gibt, wahrscheinlich weil die Beschreibung ansprechend ist, aber wenn ich die PRs überprüfe, sind sie tatsächlich fehlerhaft, haben einen Bug, oder lösen das Problem nicht, welches sie behaupten, zu lösen. 😅

Daher ist es wirklich wichtig, dass Sie den Code tatsächlich lesen und ausführen und mir in den Kommentaren mitteilen, dass Sie dies getan haben. 🤓

///

	return apiStats
}

// HTTPStats holds statistics information about
// HTTP requests made by all clients
type HTTPStats struct {
	s3RequestsInQueue       int32 // ref: https://golang.org/pkg/sync/atomic/#pkg-note-BUG
	_                       int32 // For 64 bits alignment
	s3RequestsIncoming      uint64
	rejectedRequestsAuth    uint64
	rejectedRequestsTime    uint64
	rejectedRequestsHeader  uint64
	rejectedRequestsInvalid uint64

Debería ser así porque si tienes un `ValidationError` de Pydantic en tu *response* o en cualquier lugar de tu código (no en el *request* del cliente), en realidad es un bug en tu código.

Y mientras lo arreglas, tus clientes/usuarios no deberían tener acceso a información interna sobre el error, ya que eso podría exponer una vulnerabilidad de seguridad.

    }

    @Test
    public void testUncPathNotAllowed() throws Exception {
        PathValidator noUncValidator = new PathValidator(260, 255, false, false);
        // Due to normalization bug, UNC paths are not properly detected
        // The normalization removes all duplicate backslashes, so \\\\server becomes \server
        // This test validates that paths which should be UNC but aren't detected due to normalization

    - [SIG Storage](#sig-storage-1)
    - [SIG vSphere](#sig-vsphere)
    - [SIG Windows](#sig-windows-1)
    - [Additional changes](#additional-changes)
  - [External Dependencies](#external-dependencies)
  - [Bug Fixes](#bug-fixes)
      - [General Fixes and Reliability](#general-fixes-and-reliability)
  - [Non-user-facing changes](#non-user-facing-changes)
- [v1.11.0-rc.3](#v1110-rc3)

   * inputs, regardless of how the elements are divided.
   */
  @SafeVarargs
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // TODO(cpovirk): Remove after we fix whatever the bug is.
  public final CollectorTester<T, A, R> expectCollects(R expectedResult, T... inputs) {
    List<T> list = Arrays.asList(inputs);
    doExpectCollects(expectedResult, list);

pkg encoding/json, type InvalidUTF8Error //deprecated
pkg encoding/json, type UnmarshalFieldError //deprecated
pkg go/build, const AllowBinary //deprecated
pkg go/doc, type Package struct, Bugs //deprecated
pkg go/importer, func For //deprecated
pkg go/importer, func ForCompiler //deprecated
pkg go/types, func NewInterface //deprecated
pkg go/types, method (*Interface) Embedded //deprecated

      if (prefix != nullptr && !absl::StartsWith(n->name(), prefix_cmp)) {
        status->status = tensorflow::errors::Internal(
            "BUG: The gradients prefix have been unexpectedly altered when "
            "adding the nodes to the graph. This is a bug. Please file an "
            "issue at https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/issues.");
        return;
      }

      cp >>>= 4;
      dest[4] = upperHexDigits[0x8 | (cp & 0x3)];
      cp >>>= 2;
      dest[2] = upperHexDigits[cp & 0x7];
      return dest;
    } else {
      // If this ever happens it is due to bug in UnicodeEscaper, not bad input.
      throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid unicode character value " + cp);
    }
  }

        this.useNTSmbs = th.hasCapability(SmbConstants.CAP_NT_SMBS);
        if (!this.useNTSmbs) {
            log.debug("No support for NT SMBs");
        }

        // there seems to be a bug with some servers that causes corruption if using signatures +
        // CAP_LARGE_WRITE
        if (th.hasCapability(SmbConstants.CAP_LARGE_WRITEX) && !th.areSignaturesActive()) {