}

  /**
   * A timestamp like "191216030210Z" or "20191215190210-0800" for 2019-12-15T19:02:10-08:00. This
   * is the same as [UTC_TIME] with the exception of the 4-digit year.
   */
  val GENERALIZED_TIME =
    BasicDerAdapter(
      name = "GENERALIZED TIME",
      tagClass = DerHeader.TAG_CLASS_UNIVERSAL,
      tag = 24L,
      codec =
        object : BasicDerAdapter.Codec<Long> {

        // Test index name with special characters
        builder.setSettingsIndexName("Test-Index_Name.2024");
        assertEquals("test-index_name.2024", builder.settingsIndexName);

        // Test index name with spaces (should be lowercased)
        builder.setSettingsIndexName("Test Index Name");
        assertEquals("test index name", builder.settingsIndexName);
    }

    @Test

        // When
        String[] messages = NtStatus.NT_STATUS_MESSAGES;

        // Then
        assertNotNull(messages);
        assertTrue(messages.length > 0);
        // Should have same length as codes array
        assertEquals(NtStatus.NT_STATUS_CODES.length, messages.length);

        // First message should be for success
        assertNotNull(messages[0]);

    calls++

    if (exchange != null) {
      check(exchange.finder.routePlanner.sameHostAndPort(request.url)) {
        "network interceptor ${interceptors[index - 1]} must retain the same host and port"
      }
      check(calls == 1) {
        "network interceptor ${interceptors[index - 1]} must call proceed() exactly once"
      }
    }

    // Call the next interceptor in the chain.

   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as
   * {@code requireNonNull}: Our use case is the one in which {@code T} has parametric nullness—and
   * thus its value may be legitimately {@code null}.)
   */
  @ParametricNullness
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness")

   * would be the right tool for the job here: {@code @Nullable} is the annotation that we're trying
   * to get rid of, and {@code @NonNull} would be wrong for our use case for the same reason as
   * {@code requireNonNull}: Our use case is the one in which {@code T} has parametric nullness—and
   * thus its value may be legitimately {@code null}.)
   */
  @ParametricNullness
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness")

     * SID is a domain SID, this method will return an empty String.
     *
     * @return the account name
     */
    String getAccountName();

    /**
     * Return the domain name of this SID unless it could not be
     * resolved in which case the numeric representation is returned.
     *
     * @return the domain name
     */
    String getDomainName();

    /**

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class ListEqualsTester<E> extends AbstractListTester<E> {
  public void testEquals_otherListWithSameElements() {
    assertTrue(
        "A List should equal any other List containing the same elements.",
        getList().equals(new ArrayList<E>(getOrderedElements())));
  }

  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = CollectionSize.ZERO)
  public void testEquals_otherListWithDifferentElements() {

   *     entriesInCommon(), entriesDiffering())
   * }
   */
  @Override
  int hashCode();

  /**
   * A difference between the mappings from two maps with the same key. The {@link #leftValue} and
   * {@link #rightValue} are not equal, and one but not both of them may be null.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  @DoNotMock("Use Maps.difference")

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},