})
  @ParametricNullness
  final V blockingGet(long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
      throws InterruptedException, TimeoutException, ExecutionException {
    // NOTE: if timeout < 0, remainingNanos will be < 0 and we will fall into the while(true) loop
    // at the bottom and throw a timeoutexception.
    long timeoutNanos = unit.toNanos(timeout); // we rely on the implicit null check on unit.

    clientListener.assertFailure(
      SocketTimeoutException::class.java,
      "timeout",
      "Read timed out",
    )
    assertThat(webSocket.close(1000, null)).isFalse()
  }

  /**
   * There's no read timeout when reading the first byte of a new frame. But as soon as we start
   * reading a frame we enable the read timeout. In this test we have the server returning the first
   * byte of a frame but no more frames.

  }

  /** Tests that the {@link Future#get(long, TimeUnit)} method times out correctly. */
  public void testTimeoutOnGetWorksCorrectly() throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {

    // The task thread waits for the latch, so we expect a timeout here.
    try {
      future.get(20, MILLISECONDS);
      fail("Should have timed out trying to get the value.");
    } catch (TimeoutException expected) {
    } finally {

  }

  /** Tests that the {@link Future#get(long, TimeUnit)} method times out correctly. */
  public void testTimeoutOnGetWorksCorrectly() throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {

    // The task thread waits for the latch, so we expect a timeout here.
    try {
      future.get(20, MILLISECONDS);
      fail("Should have timed out trying to get the value.");
    } catch (TimeoutException expected) {
    } finally {

    FUTURE(Timeout.SMALL, Timeout.MAX),
    SMALL(Timeout.SMALL),
    FINITE(Timeout.MIN, Timeout.MINUS_SMALL, Timeout.ZERO, Timeout.SMALL),
    INFINITE(Timeout.LARGE, Timeout.MAX);

    final ImmutableList<Timeout> timeouts;

    TimeoutsToUse(Timeout... timeouts) {
      this.timeouts = ImmutableList.copyOf(timeouts);
    }
  }

  /** Possible outcomes of calling any of the methods under test. */

          public final void awaitRunning(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws TimeoutException {
            delegate.awaitRunning(timeout, unit);
          }

          @Override
          public final void awaitTerminated() {
            delegate.awaitTerminated();
          }

          @Override
          public final void awaitTerminated(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws TimeoutException {

	timeout := newDynamicTimeout(time.Minute, time.Second)

	initial := timeout.Timeout()

	for range dynamicTimeoutLogSize {
		timeout.LogSuccess(20 * time.Second)
	}

	adjusted := timeout.Timeout()

	for range dynamicTimeoutLogSize {
		timeout.LogSuccess(20 * time.Second)
	}

	adjustedAgain := timeout.Timeout()

	if initial <= adjusted || adjusted <= adjustedAgain {

    public void test_execute_withTimeoutException() {
        // Create mock SearchEngineClient that throws timeout exception
        searchEngineClient = new SearchEngineClient() {
            @Override
            public long deleteByQuery(String index, QueryBuilder query) {
                throw new RuntimeException("Operation timed out after 30 seconds");
            }
        };

    // we try hard to make them robust in practice.  We could additionally try to add in a system
    // load timeout multiplier.  Or we could try to use a CPU time bound instead of wall clock time
    // bound.  But these ideas are harder to implement.  We do not try to detect or handle a
    // user-specified -XX:+DisableExplicitGC.
    //
    // TODO(user): Consider using

                    .setInterval(interval)
                    .setThreads(threads)
                    .setTimeout(timeout)
                    .setType(type)
                    .execute()
                    .actionGet(timeout);
            append(buf, "cluster_name", () -> response.getClusterName().value()).append(',');