return 0;
    }

    @Override
    protected int readParametersWireFormat(final byte[] buffer, final int bufferIndex, final int len) {
        // observed two zero bytes here with at least win98
        return 2;
    }

    @Override
    protected int readDataWireFormat(final byte[] buffer, int bufferIndex, final int len) throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {

</pre>

<p>
the assignment to <code>a</code> is not followed by
any synchronization event, so it is not guaranteed to be
observed by any other goroutine.
In fact, an aggressive compiler might delete the entire <code>go</code> statement.
</p>

<p>
If the effects of a goroutine must be observed by another goroutine,
use a synchronization mechanism such as a lock or channel
communication to establish a relative ordering.
</p>

   *
   * The initial write to delegateRef is made definitely visible via the semantics of
   * addListener/SES.schedule. The later racy write in cancel() is not guaranteed to be observed,
   * however that is fine since the correctness is based on the atomic state in our base class. The
   * initial write to timer is never definitely visible to Fire.run since it is assigned after

     *
     * @see jcifs.util.transport.Response#verifySignature(byte[], int, int)
     */
    @Override
    public boolean verifySignature(final byte[] buffer, final int i, final int size) {
        // observed too that signatures on error responses are sometimes wrong??
        // Looks like the failure case also is just reflecting back the signature we sent

        // Assert
        assertSame(session, result);
        verify(handle).getSession();
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("getSession(): may return null and should be observed as such")
    void getSession_returnsNull() {
        // Arrange
        when(handle.getSession()).thenReturn(null);

        // Act
        SmbSession result = handle.getSession();

        // Assert

            }
          };
      executor.execute(errorTask);
      service.execute(barrierTask); // submit directly to the service
      // the barrier task runs after the error task so we know that the error has been observed by
      // SequentialExecutor by the time the barrier is satisfied
      barrier.await(1, SECONDS);
      executor.execute(barrierTask);
      // timeout means the second task wasn't even tried

            }
          };
      executor.execute(errorTask);
      service.execute(barrierTask); // submit directly to the service
      // the barrier task runs after the error task so we know that the error has been observed by
      // SequentialExecutor by the time the barrier is satisfied
      barrier.await(1, SECONDS);
      executor.execute(barrierTask);
      // timeout means the second task wasn't even tried

    server.requireClientAuth()
    val call = client.newCall(Request.Builder().url(server.url("/")).build())
    assertFailsWith<IOException> {
      call.execute()
    }

    // Observed Events are variable
    // JDK 14
    // CallStart, ProxySelectStart, ProxySelectEnd, DnsStart, DnsEnd, ConnectStart, SecureConnectStart,

   * happens when an {@link AtomicInteger#compareAndSet} fails, but we can simulate the case where
   * the putIfAbsent returns a non-null value, and the case where the replace() of an observed zero
   * fails.
   */
  public void testAdd_withFailures() {
    AtomicInteger existing = new AtomicInteger(12);
    AtomicInteger existingZero = new AtomicInteger(0);

    // initial map.get()

      }
    }
    int oldValue = existingCounter.get();
    if (oldValue == expectedOldCount) {
      if (oldValue == 0) {
        if (newCount == 0) {
          // Just observed a 0; try to remove the entry to clean up the map
          countMap.remove(element, existingCounter);
          return true;
        } else {
          AtomicInteger newCounter = new AtomicInteger(newCount);