* array of the erased type.
   */
  T create(Object... elements);

  /**
   * Helper method to create an array of the appropriate type used by this generator. The returned
   * array will contain only nulls.
   */
  E[] createArray(int length);

  /**
   * Returns the iteration ordering of elements, given the order in which they were added to the

  }

  /*
   * All the ContiguousSet generators below manually reject nulls here. In principle, we'd like to
   * defer that to Range, since it's ContiguousSet.create() that's used to create the sets. However,
   * that gets messy here, and we already have null tests for Range.
   */

  /*
   * These generators also rely on consecutive integer inputs (not necessarily in order, but no

  /**
   * Visits the given types. Null types are ignored. This allows subclasses to call {@code
   * visit(parameterizedType.getOwnerType())} safely without having to check nulls.
   */
  public final void visit(@Nullable Type... types) {
    for (Type type : types) {
      if (type == null || !visited.add(type)) {
        // null owner type, or already visited;
        continue;
      }

      for (Object element : contents) {
        if (element == null) {
          throw new NullPointerException();
        }
      }
    }
  }

  @Override
  public int size() {
    return contents.length;
  }

  @Override
  public boolean contains(@Nullable Object object) {
    if (!allowNulls) {
      // behave badly
      if (object == null) {
        throw new NullPointerException();
      }
    }

    assertTrue("add(null) should return true", collection.add(null));
    expectAdded((E) null);
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_ADD, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES)
  public void testAdd_nullUnsupported() {
    assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> collection.add(null));
    expectUnchanged();
    expectNullMissingWhenNullUnsupported("Should not contain null after unsupported add(null)");
  }

    assertTrue("add(null) should return true", collection.add(null));
    expectAdded((E) null);
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(value = SUPPORTS_ADD, absent = ALLOWS_NULL_VALUES)
  public void testAdd_nullUnsupported() {
    assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> collection.add(null));
    expectUnchanged();
    expectNullMissingWhenNullUnsupported("Should not contain null after unsupported add(null)");
  }

  @Override
  public boolean contains(@Nullable Object target) {
    @Nullable Object[] table = this.table;
    if (target == null || table.length == 0) {
      return false;
    }
    for (int i = Hashing.smearedHash(target); ; i++) {
      i &= mask;
      Object candidate = table[i];
      if (candidate == null) {
        return false;
      } else if (candidate.equals(target)) {
        return true;
      }
    }
  }

   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to
   * permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on the other.
   * Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection

                    }
                    return transform(fromList, removeFirst);
                  }
                })
            .named("Lists.transform, random access, no nulls")
            .withFeatures(
                CollectionSize.ANY,
                ListFeature.REMOVE_OPERATIONS,
                CollectionFeature.SERIALIZABLE,
                CollectionFeature.ALLOWS_NULL_QUERIES)

    return asImmutableList(array);
  }

  /** Views the array as an immutable list. Checks for nulls; does not copy. */
  private static <E> ImmutableList<E> construct(Object... elements) {
    return asImmutableList(checkElementsNotNull(elements));
  }

  /**
   * Views the array as an immutable list. Does not check for nulls; does not copy.
   *
   * <p>The array must be internally created.
   */