t.Errorf("Test %d: %s: Expected to fail with error \"%v\", but instead failed with error \"%v\" instead.", i, instanceType, testCase.expectedError, actualErr)
			continue
		}
		// Test passes as expected, but the output values are verified for correctness here.
		if actualErr == nil {
			// Asserting whether the md5 output is correct.

Sebastián Ramírez <******@****.***> 1731896744 +0100

Sebastián Ramírez <******@****.***> 1731896744 +0100

Sebastián Ramírez <******@****.***> 1731896744 +0100

 *   <li>{@link Stopwatch}
 *   <li>{@link Throwables}
 *   <li>{@link Verify}
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h3>The rest</h3>
 *
 * This package also contains some classes with niche use cases (e.g., {@link Utf8} and {@link
 * Defaults}), as well as a number of classes that have been superseded by additions to the JDK.
 */
@CheckReturnValue
@NullMarked
package com.google.common.base;

                  @Override
                  public Integer load(Integer from) {
                    return (int) misses.incrementAndGet();
                  }
                });

    // To start, fill up the cache.
    // Each miss both increments the counter and causes the map to grow by one,
    // so until evictions begin, the size of the map is the greatest return
    // value seen so far

                  @Override
                  public Integer load(Integer from) {
                    return (int) misses.incrementAndGet();
                  }
                });

    // To start, fill up the cache.
    // Each miss both increments the counter and causes the map to grow by one,
    // so until evictions begin, the size of the map is the greatest return
    // value seen so far

///

## Use cases { #use-cases }

Some use cases include:

* Converting non-JSON request bodies to JSON (e.g. <a href="https://msgpack.org/index.html" class="external-link" target="_blank">`msgpack`</a>).
* Decompressing gzip-compressed request bodies.
* Automatically logging all request bodies.

## Handling custom request body encodings { #handling-custom-request-body-encodings }

        across a similar need in our own work, that's extremely helpful in studying how broadly
        useful the proposed change will be.

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: Concrete Use Cases
      description: Please provide use cases that actually came up in the real world.
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: checkboxes
    attributes:
      label: Checklist
      options:
        - label: >

In the previous example, because the classes were different, we had to use the `response_model` parameter. But that also means that we don't get the support from the editor and tools checking the function return type.

But in most of the cases where we need to do something like this, we want the model just to **filter/remove** some of the data as in this example.