non-backward-compatible API changes without a major release. Reviewers of
    your pull request will comment on any API compatibility issues
    [following API review practices](https://github.com/tensorflow/community/blob/master/governance/api-reviews.md).
*   When you contribute a new feature to TensorFlow, the maintenance burden is
    (by default) transferred to the TensorFlow team. This means that the benefit

* Review those pull requests, requesting changes or approving them. For the languages I don't speak, I'll wait for several others to review the translation before merging.

/// tip

# This is needed for all Clang17 builds but must not be present in GCC builds.
common:rbe_linux_cpu --copt=-Wno-error=unused-command-line-argument
# This was added in clang-16 by https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574.
# Can be removed once upb is updated, since a type definition is used within
# offset of in the current version of ubp.

    return None

  print('You have Clang %s installed.\n' % curr_version)
  return curr_version


# Disable clang extension that rejects type definitions within offsetof.
# This was added in clang-16 by https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574.
# Still required for clang-17.
# Can be removed once upb is updated, since a type definition is used within
# offset of in the current version of ubp. See

rest

// restaurant : Binky Moon, LLC
// https://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/restaurant.html
restaurant

// review : dot Review Limited
// https://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/review.html
review

// reviews : Dog Beach, LLC
// https://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/reviews.html
reviews

// rexroth : Robert Bosch GMBH
// https://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/rexroth.html
rexroth

reservd.dev.thingdust.io
reservd.disrec.thingdust.io
reservd.testing.thingdust.io
reserve-online.com
reserve-online.net
resindevice.io
rest
restaurant
restaurant.bj
resto.bj
review
reviews
revista.bo
rexroth
rg.it
rgr.jp
rhcloud.com
ri.it
ri.us
ribeirao.br
ric.jelastic.vps-host.net
rich
richardli
ricoh
rieti.it
rifu.miyagi.jp
riik.ee

reservd.dev.thingdust.io
reservd.disrec.thingdust.io
reservd.testing.thingdust.io
reserve-online.com
reserve-online.net
resindevice.io
rest
restaurant
restaurant.bj
resto.bj
review
reviews
revista.bo
rexroth
rg.it
rgr.jp
rhcloud.com
ri.it
ri.us
ribeirao.br
ric.jelastic.vps-host.net
rich
richardli
ricoh
rieti.it
rifu.miyagi.jp
riik.ee

name: 'Dependency Review'
on: [pull_request]

permissions:
  contents: read

jobs:
  dependency-review:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: 'Checkout Repository'
        uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - name: 'Dependency Review'

* They are rarely updated after creation and initial review, and then become hard to follow, especially after important decisions are made
* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like Markdown can be
* Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

          * I already hit the "watch" button in this repository to receive notifications and I commit to help at least 2 people that ask questions in the future.
          * Review one Pull Request by downloading the code and following [all the review process](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/help-fastapi/#review-pull-requests).

      options:
        - label: I commit to help with one of those options 👆
          required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: example