console.log(pr_resp);
    throw `PR:{pr_number} needs to be valid and closed (merged)`;
  }
  const pr_title = pr_resp.data.title;
  // Assign to PR owner and reviewers
  const assignees = pr_resp.data.assignees.concat(pr_resp.data.requested_reviewers);
  let assignee_logins = assignees.map(x => x.login);
  assignee_logins.push(pr_resp.data.user.login);

   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the
   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.

   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the
   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.

   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>This method is suitable for the common use case of dividing work among buckets that meet the
   * following conditions:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>You want to assign the same fraction of inputs to each bucket.
   *   <li>When you reduce the number of buckets, you can accept that the most recently added

                (v1, v2) -> {
                  throw new IllegalArgumentException("Multiple values for key: " + v1 + ", " + v2);
                }),
        (accum, t) -> {
          /*
           * We assign these to variables before calling checkNotNull to work around a bug in our
           * nullness checker.
           */
          K key = keyFunction.apply(t);
          V newValue = valueFunction.apply(t);

- `users[].existingSecret` - secret name that contains the secretKey of user
- `users[].existingSecretKey` - data key in existingSecret secret containing the secretKey
- `users[].policy` - name of the policy to assign to user

### Create service account after install

Install the chart, specifying the service accounts you want to create after install:

```bash

   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the
   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.

     *
     * @param id            the unique identifier of the repository
     * @param url           the URL of the repository
     * @param layout        the layout of the repository
     * @param uniqueVersion whether to assign each snapshot a unique version
     */
    public DefaultArtifactRepository(String id, String url, ArtifactRepositoryLayout layout, boolean uniqueVersion) {
        super(id, url);
        this.layout = layout;
    }

   * or extract a variable, and put the suppression on that. However, a local variable typically
   * doesn't work: Because nullness analyses typically infer the nullness of local variables,
   * there's no way to assign a {@code @Nullable T} to a field {@code T foo;} and instruct the
   * analysis that that means "plain {@code T}" rather than the inferred type {@code @Nullable T}.

  }

  /*
   * To avoid the need to call requireNonNull so much, we could consider more clever approaches,
   * such as:
   *
   * - Make checkOpen return the non-null `seq`. Then callers can assign that to a local variable or
   *   even back to `this.seq`. However, that may suggest that we're defending against concurrent
   *   mutation, which is not an actual risk because we use `synchronized`.