## 試用看看 { #check-it }

如果你打開 API 文件，你可以先驗證並指定你要授權的 scopes。

<img src="/img/tutorial/security/image11.png">

如果你沒有選任何 scope，你仍會「通過驗證」，但當你嘗試存取 `/users/me/` 或 `/users/me/items/` 時，會收到沒有足夠權限的錯誤。你仍能存取 `/status/`。

若你只選了 `me` 而未選 `items`，你能存取 `/users/me/`，但無法存取 `/users/me/items/`。

這就是第三方應用在取得使用者提供的 token 後，嘗試存取上述路徑操作時，會依使用者授與該應用的權限多寡而有不同結果。

## 關於第三方整合 { #about-third-party-integrations }

   *
   * @since 33.4.0 (but since 21.0 in the JRE flavor)
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("NullableOptional") // Null passthrough is reasonable for type conversions
  @IgnoreJRERequirement // Users will use this only if they're already using Optional.
  public static <T> @Nullable Optional<T> fromJavaUtil(
      java.util.@Nullable Optional<T> javaUtilOptional) {

from fastapi import Depends, FastAPI

app = FastAPI()


def get_username():
    try:
        yield "Rick"
    finally:
        print("Cleanup up before response is sent")


@app.get("/users/me")
def get_user_me(username: Annotated[str, Depends(get_username, scope="function")]):

Create user after install Install the chart, specifying the users you want to create after install: ```bash helm install --set users[0].accessKey=accessKey,users[0].secretKey=secretKey,users[0].policy=none,users[1].accessKey=accessKey2,users[1].secretRef=existingSecret,users[1].secretKey=password,users[1].policy=none minio/minio ``` Description of the configuration parameters used above - - `users[].accessKey` - accessKey of user - `users[].secretKey` - secretKey of usersecretRef - `users[].existingSecret`...

Create user after install Install the chart, specifying the users you want to create after install: ```bash helm install --set users[0].accessKey=accessKey,users[0].secretKey=secretKey,users[0].policy=none,users[1].accessKey=accessKey2,users[1].secretRef=existingSecret,users[1].secretKey=password,users[1].policy=none minio/minio ``` Description of the configuration parameters used above - - `users[].accessKey` - accessKey of user - `users[].secretKey` - secretKey of usersecretRef - `users[].existingSecret`...

 * existing users, but it can't *fix* existing users because any users who needed
 * `Function<@Nullable A, @Nullable B>` already had to find a workaround. Still, there is a *ton* of
 * fallout from trying to switch. I would be shocked if the switch would offer benefits to anywhere
 * near enough users to justify the costs.
 *

    return {"q": q, "skip": skip, "limit": limit}


@app.get("/items/")
async def read_items(commons: dict = Depends(common_parameters)):
    return commons


@app.get("/users/")
async def read_users(commons: dict = Depends(common_parameters)):

    return get_redoc_html(
        openapi_url=app.openapi_url,
        title=app.title + " - ReDoc",
        redoc_js_url="https://unpkg.com/redoc@2/bundles/redoc.standalone.js",
    )


@app.get("/users/{username}")
async def read_user(username: str):

    return {"q": q, "skip": skip, "limit": limit}


@app.get("/items/")
async def read_items(commons: Annotated[dict, Depends(common_parameters)]):
    return commons


@app.get("/users/")
async def read_users(commons: Annotated[dict, Depends(common_parameters)]):

#   git log --format='%aE - %aN' | sort -uf
#
# For explanation on this file format: man git-shortlog

Anand Babu (AB) Periasamy <******@****.***> Anand Babu (AB) Periasamy <abperiasamy@users.noreply.github.com>
Anand Babu (AB) Periasamy <******@****.***> <******@****.***>
Anis Elleuch <******@****.***>
Frederick F. Kautz IV <******@****.***> <******@****.***>