* returns the elements in the order they are returned by the collection's iterator. The returned
   * array is "safe" in that no references to it are maintained by the collection. The caller is
   * thus free to modify the returned array.
   *
   * <p>This method assumes that the collection size doesn't change while the method is running.
   *
   * <p>TODO(kevinb): support concurrently modified collections?
   *

   * has not added {@link AnnotatedType}. That means that we cannot implement that interface in
   * source code in a way that will compile on both Java and Android. If we include the {@code
   * getAnnotatedBounds()} method, then its return type means it won't compile on Android, while if
   * we don't include the method, then the compiler will complain that an abstract method is

   *     lightweight listeners that would be safe to execute in any thread, consider {@link
   *     MoreExecutors#directExecutor}.
   * @since 13.0
   */
  void addListener(Listener listener, Executor executor);

  /**
   * The lifecycle states of a service.
   *
   * <p>The ordering of the {@link State} enum is defined such that if there is a state transition

   * while other events occur sequentially; cancels may occur concurrently with other events. For
   * example, thread A may be executing [responseBodyStart] while thread B executes [canceled].
   * Implementations must support such concurrent calls.
   *
   * Note that cancellation is best-effort and that a call may proceed normally after it has been

* For `PUT` requests to `/items/{item_id}`, read the body as JSON:
    * Check that it has a required attribute `name` that should be a `str`.
    * Check that it has a required attribute `price` that has to be a `float`.
    * Check that it has an optional attribute `is_offer`, that should be a `bool`, if present.
    * All this would also work for deeply nested JSON objects.

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(@Nullable Object obj) {
      if (obj instanceof SupplierComposition) {
        SupplierComposition<?, ?> that = (SupplierComposition<?, ?>) obj;
        return function.equals(that.function) && supplier.equals(that.supplier);
      }
      return false;
    }

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return Objects.hash(function, supplier);
    }

  /**
   * Attempts to skip up to {@code n} bytes from the given input stream, but not more than {@code
   * in.available()} bytes. This prevents {@code FileInputStream} from skipping more bytes than
   * actually remain in the file, something that it {@linkplain java.io.FileInputStream#skip(long)
   * specifies} it can do in its Javadoc despite the fact that it is violating the contract of
   * {@code InputStream.skip()}.
   */

        MsrpcSamrOpenDomain msrpcSamrOpenDomain = new MsrpcSamrOpenDomain(mockHandle, access, mockSid, mockDomainHandle);

        // Then
        // Verify that ptype is set to 0
        assertEquals(0, msrpcSamrOpenDomain.getPtype(), "ptype should be initialized to 0");

        // Verify that flags are set correctly (DCERPC_FIRST_FRAG | DCERPC_LAST_FRAG)

  | grep -E -v "^//tensorflow" \
  | sed -e 's|:.*||' \
  | sort -u
}

# Verify that, given a build target and a license-list generator target, all of
# the dependencies of that target which include a license notice file are then
# included when generating that license. Necessary because the license targets
# in TensorFlow are manually enumerated rather than generated automatically.
do_external_licenses_check(){
  BUILD_TARGET="$1"