}

  /**
   * ReadWriteLock implementation whose read and write locks retain a reference back to this lock.
   * Otherwise, a reference to just the read lock or just the write lock would not suffice to ensure
   * the {@code ReadWriteLock} is retained.
   */
  private static final class WeakSafeReadWriteLock implements ReadWriteLock {
    private final ReadWriteLock delegate;

    WeakSafeReadWriteLock() {

   * HashMultimap#create()}, {@link LinkedHashMultimap#create()}, {@link
   * LinkedListMultimap#create()}, {@link TreeMultimap#create()}, and {@link
   * TreeMultimap#create(Comparator, Comparator)} won't suffice.
   *
   * <p>Note: the multimap assumes complete ownership over of {@code map} and the collections
   * returned by {@code factory}. Those objects should not be manually updated and they should not

   * HashMultimap#create()}, {@link LinkedHashMultimap#create()}, {@link
   * LinkedListMultimap#create()}, {@link TreeMultimap#create()}, and {@link
   * TreeMultimap#create(Comparator, Comparator)} won't suffice.
   *
   * <p>Note: the multimap assumes complete ownership over of {@code map} and the collections
   * returned by {@code factory}. Those objects should not be manually updated and they should not

   * {@code factory.get()} does.
   *
   * <p>Call this method only when the simpler factory methods in classes like {@link
   * HashBasedTable} and {@link TreeBasedTable} won't suffice.
   *
   * <p>The views returned by the {@code Table} methods {@link Table#column}, {@link
   * Table#columnKeySet}, and {@link Table#columnMap} have iterators that don't support {@code

        Object key = node.getKey();

        // TODO Does this check need to happen here? Had to add the same call
        // below when we iterate on child nodes -- will that suffice?
        if (managedVersions.containsKey(key)) {
            manageArtifact(node, managedVersions, listeners);
        }

        List<ResolutionNode> previousNodes = resolvedArtifacts.get(key);

 $fs-unit: if(type-of($fs) == \"number\", unit($fs), false);\n\n  // Add !important suffix if needed\n  $rfs-suffix: if($important, \" !important\", \"\");\n\n  // If $fs isn't a number (like inherit) or $fs has a unit (not px or rem, like 1.5em) or $ is 0, just print the value\n  @if not $fs-unit or $fs-unit != \"\" and $fs-unit != \"px\" and $fs-unit != \"rem\" or $fs == 0 {\n    font-size: #{$fs}#{$rfs-suffix};\n  }\n  @else {\n    // Remove unit from $fs for calculations\n    @if $fs-unit ==...

procedures, authorization keys, or other information required to install
and execute modified versions of a covered work in that User Product from
a modified version of its Corresponding Source.  The information must
suffice to ensure that the continued functioning of the modified object
code is in no case prevented or interfered with solely because
modification has been made.

<p>
Go approaches its memory model in much the same way as the rest of the language,
aiming to keep the semantics simple, understandable, and useful.
This section gives a general overview of the approach and should suffice for most programmers.
The memory model is specified more formally in the next section.
</p>

<p>
A data race is defined as

- kubeadm: Control plane images (etcd, kube-apiserver, kube-proxy, etc.) no longer use arch suffixes. Arch suffixes are kept for kube-dns only. ([#66960](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/66960),
[@rosti](https://github.com/rosti)) Courtesy of SIG Cluster Lifecycle, SIG Release, and SIG Testing

      // Just extract the high 64 bits (assuming the rest is user-modifiable).
      addressAsLong = ByteBuffer.wrap(ip6.getAddress(), 0, 8).getLong();
    }

    // Many strategies for hashing are possible. This might suffice for now.
    int coercedHash = murmur3_32_fixed().hashLong(addressAsLong).asInt();

    // Squash into 224/4 Multicast and 240/4 Reserved space (i.e. 224/3).
    coercedHash |= 0xe0000000;