* way to obtain a {@code List<ListenableFuture<T>>} from this method is an unchecked (but safe)
   * cast:
   *
   * <pre>
   *   {@code @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // guaranteed by invokeAll contract}
   *   {@code List<ListenableFuture<T>> futures = (List) executor.invokeAll(tasks);}
   * </pre>
   *
   * @return A list of {@code ListenableFuture} instances representing the tasks, in the same

      if (interrupted) {
        Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Invokes {@code future.}{@link Future#get() get()} uninterruptibly.
   *
   * <p>Similar methods:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>To retrieve a result from a {@code Future} that is already done, use {@link
   *       Futures#getDone Futures.getDone}.

Und wenn es irgendeinen anderen Stil- oder Konsistenz-Bedarf gibt, bitte ich direkt darum oder füge zusätzliche Commits mit den erforderlichen Änderungen hinzu.

### Den Code überprüfen

* Prüfen und lesen Sie den Code, fragen Sie sich, ob er Sinn macht, **führen Sie ihn lokal aus** und testen Sie, ob er das Problem tatsächlich löst.

 *   {@literal @}GwtCompatible(serializable = true)
 *   {@literal <E> List<E>} newArrayList(E... elements);
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>The {@code newArrayList(E[])} method of all implementations of {@code ListFactory} is expected
 * to return a value with a GWT serializable type.
 *
 * <p>Note that a {@code GwtCompatible} type may have some {@link GwtIncompatible} methods.
 *
 * @author Charles Fry
 * @author Hayward Chan
 */

  ASSERT_EQ(errors::OK, s.code()) << s.message();
  if (isa<TracingOperation>(check_numerics_op.get())) {
    s = dyn_cast<TracingOperation>(check_numerics_op.get())
            ->SetOpName("check_numerics");
    ASSERT_EQ(errors::OK, s.code()) << s.message();
  }
  s = AddInput(check_numerics_op.get(), t.get(), &forward_op);
  ASSERT_EQ(errors::OK, s.code()) << s.message();
  string message = "This is the way!";

  }

  /** See https://api.slack.com/methods/oauth.access. */
  public OAuthSession exchangeCode(String code, HttpUrl redirectUrl) throws IOException {
    HttpUrl url = baseUrl.newBuilder("oauth.access")
        .addQueryParameter("client_id", clientId)
        .addQueryParameter("client_secret", clientSecret)
        .addQueryParameter("code", code)
        .addQueryParameter("redirect_uri", redirectUrl.toString())
        .build();

#### Fix it with `secrets.compare_digest()`

But in our code we are actually using `secrets.compare_digest()`.

In short, it will take the same time to compare `stanleyjobsox` to `stanleyjobson` than it takes to compare `johndoe` to `stanleyjobson`. And the same for the password.

That way, using `secrets.compare_digest()` in your application code, it will be safe against this whole range of security attacks.

     */
    @Nullable
    Version getRecommendedVersion();

    /**
     * Determines whether the specified version is contained within this constraint.
     *
     * @param version the version to test, must not be {@code null}
     * @return {@code true} if this range contains the specified version, {@code false} otherwise
     */
    boolean contains(@Nonnull Version version);

    /**

     * @param type The type of the class realm, must not be {@code null}.
     * @param parent The parent realm for the new realm, may be {@code null}.
     * @param parentImports The packages/types to import from the parent realm, may be {@code null}.
     * @param foreignImports The packages/types to import from foreign realms, may be {@code null}.

          if (c != '\\'.code) {
            append(c.toChar())
            continue
          }
          when (buffer.readUtf8CodePoint()) {
            '\\'.code -> append('\\')
            '#'.code -> append('#')
            'n'.code -> append('\n')
            'r'.code -> append('\r')
            's'.code -> append(' ')
            't'.code -> append('\t')
            'f'.code -> append('\u000c')