* handling not just {@code Iterable<S>} instances, but also any {@code
     * Iterable<? extends S>}. However, the need for this comes up so rarely
     * that it doesn't justify making everyone else deal with the very ugly
     * wildcard.
     */
    return new LexicographicalOrdering<S>(this);
  }

  // Regular instance methods

  @Override

      // don't inline this: we want to fail atomically if key or value is null
      entries[size++] = entry;
      return this;
    }

    /**
     * Adds the given {@code entry} to the map, making it immutable if necessary. If the same key is
     * put more than once, {@link #buildOrThrow} will fail, while {@link #buildKeepingLast} will
     * keep the last value put for that key.
     *
     * @since 11.0

      alternatingKeysAndValues[2 * size] = key;
      alternatingKeysAndValues[2 * size + 1] = value;
      size++;
      return this;
    }

    /**
     * Adds the given {@code entry} to the map, making it immutable if necessary. If the same key is
     * put more than once, {@link #buildOrThrow} will fail, while {@link #buildKeepingLast} will
     * keep the last value put for that key.
     *
     * @since 11.0

 * socket option on an IPv6 socket). Yes, it's confusing. Nevertheless, these "mapped" addresses
 * were never supposed to be seen on the wire. That assumption was dropped, some say mistakenly, in
 * later RFCs with the apparent aim of making IPv4-to-IPv6 transition simpler.
 *
 * <p>Technically one <i>can</i> create a 128bit IPv6 address with the wire format of a "mapped"
 * address, as shown above, and transmit it in an IPv6 packet header. However, Java's InetAddress

// output are interpreted as UTF-8-encoded code points.
func Map(mapping func(r rune) rune, s []byte) []byte {
	// In the worst case, the slice can grow when mapped, making
	// things unpleasant. But it's so rare we barge in assuming it's
	// fine. It could also shrink but that falls out naturally.
	b := make([]byte, 0, len(s))
	for i := 0; i < len(s); {
		wid := 1
		r := rune(s[i])

*   DaemonSet status includes a new field named `conditions`, making it consistent with other workloads controllers. ([#55272](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/55272),[ @janetkuo](https://github.com/janetkuo))

    @CanIgnoreReturnValue
    @Override
    public Builder<K, V> put(K key, V value) {
      super.put(key, value);
      return this;
    }

    /**
     * Adds the given {@code entry} to the map, making it immutable if necessary. Duplicate keys,
     * according to the comparator (which might be the keys' natural order), are not allowed, and
     * will cause {@link #build} to fail.
     *
     * @since 11.0
     */

        } else {
            boolean runningOnCI = isRunningOnCI(cliRequest.getSystemProperties());
            if (runningOnCI) {
                slf4jLogger.info(
                        "Making this build non-interactive, because the environment variable CI equals \"true\"."
                                + " Disable this detection by removing that variable or adding --force-interactive.");

      checkEntryNotNull(key, value);
      keys[size] = key;
      values[size] = value;
      size++;
      return this;
    }

    /**
     * Adds the given {@code entry} to the map, making it immutable if necessary. Duplicate keys,
     * according to the comparator (which might be the keys' natural order), are not allowed, and
     * will cause {@link #build} to fail.
     *
     * @since 11.0
     */

[Prevents deletion of Persistent Volume Claims that are used by a pod](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/498) and [Persistent Volumes that are bound to a Persistent Volume Claim](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/499), making it impossible to delete storage that is in use by a pod.

This release also includes [Topology Aware Volume Scheduling](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/490) for local persistent volumes, the stable release of [Detailed...