// we do not have to log this.
				return
			}
		}
		if closer, ok := enc.(expfmt.Closer); ok {
			closer.Close()
		}
	})
}

// NoAuthMiddleware no auth middle ware.
func NoAuthMiddleware(h http.Handler) http.Handler {
	return h
}

// AuthMiddleware checks if the bearer token is valid and authorized.
func AuthMiddleware(h http.Handler) http.Handler {

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial008c_an_py39.py hl[15:16] *}

In diesem Fall sieht der Client eine *HTTP 500 Internal Server Error*-Response, wie es sein sollte, da wir keine `HTTPException` oder Ähnliches auslösen, aber der Server hat **keine Logs** oder einen anderen Hinweis darauf, was der Fehler war. 😱

		return
	}

	if sizeS.replTargetStats == nil && len(roi.TargetStatuses) > 0 {
		sizeS.replTargetStats = make(map[string]replTargetSizeSummary)
	}

	for arn, tgtStatus := range roi.TargetStatuses {
		tgtSizeS, ok := sizeS.replTargetStats[arn]
		if !ok {
			tgtSizeS = replTargetSizeSummary{}
		}
		switch tgtStatus {
		case replication.Pending:
			tgtSizeS.pendingCount++

   *          |              /   .     thresholdPermits and maxPermits
   *          |             /    .
   *          |            /     .
   *          |           /      .
   *   stable +----------/  WARM .
   * interval |          .   UP  .
   *          |          . PERIOD.
   *          |          .       .
   *        0 +----------+-------+--------------→ storedPermits
   *          0 thresholdPermits maxPermits

Im vorherigen Beispiel mussten wir den `response_model`-Parameter verwenden, weil die Klassen unterschiedlich waren. Das bedeutet aber auch, wir bekommen keine Unterstützung vom Editor und anderen Tools, die den Funktions-Rückgabewert überprüfen.

	token := r.Form.Get(stsToken)
	if token == "" {
		token = r.Form.Get(stsWebIdentityToken)
	}

	accessToken := r.Form.Get(stsWebIdentityAccessToken)

	// RoleARN parameter processing: If a role ARN is given in the request, we
	// use that and validate the authentication request. If not, we assume this
	// is an STS request for a claim based IDP (if one is present) and set
	// roleArn = openid.DummyRoleARN.
	//

    for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
      limiter.acquire(); // // #4
    }
    stopwatch.sleepMillis(200); // #5: to repay for the last acquire
    stopwatch.sleepMillis(1000); // #6: still warm! It would take another 3 seconds to go cold
    for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
      limiter.acquire(); // #7
    }
    assertEvents(
        "R0.00, R1.75, R1.26, R0.76, R0.30, R0.20, R0.20, R0.20", // #1

    for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
      limiter.acquire(); // // #4
    }
    stopwatch.sleepMillis(200); // #5: to repay for the last acquire
    stopwatch.sleepMillis(1000); // #6: still warm! It would take another 3 seconds to go cold
    for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
      limiter.acquire(); // #7
    }
    assertEvents(
        "R0.00, R1.75, R1.26, R0.76, R0.30, R0.20, R0.20, R0.20", // #1

import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Tests for {@link ImmutableSetMultimap}.
 *
 * @author Mike Ward
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public class ImmutableSetMultimapTest extends TestCase {
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @AndroidIncompatible // test-suite builders

      // Fine: If it doesn't exist, then there's no chance that we're going to be asked to test it.
    }

    /*
     * These methods "should" call checkNotNull. However, I'm wary of accidentally introducing
     * anything that might slow down execution on such a hot path. Given that the methods are only
     * package-private, I feel OK with just not testing them for NPE.
     *