to those values. A type may be denoted by a <i>type name</i>, if it has one, which must be
followed by <a href="#Instantiations">type arguments</a> if the type is generic.
A type may also be specified using a <i>type literal</i>, which composes a type
from existing types.
</p>

<pre class="ebnf">
Type     = TypeName [ TypeArgs ] | TypeLit | "(" Type ")" .
TypeName = identifier | QualifiedIdent .

                        "type": "string"
                    },
                    "type": {
                        "title": "Error Type",
                        "type": "string"
                    }
                }
            },
            "HTTPValidationError": {
                "title": "HTTPValidationError",
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {

 * field, the injected field type and the {@link #requestType()}.
 * <p>
 * If the {@code requestType} is not set explicitly, it will be inferred
 * from the {@code pathScope} and the injected field type. If the type
 * is {@link org.apache.maven.api.Node Node} and {@code pathScope == ""},
 * then the dependencies will be <i>collected</i>.
 * If the type is {@link org.apache.maven.api.Node Node} or

 */
class DefaultExecutionEvent implements ExecutionEvent {

    private final Type type;

    private final MavenSession session;

    private final MojoExecution mojoExecution;

    private final Exception exception;

    DefaultExecutionEvent(Type type, MavenSession session, MojoExecution mojoExecution, Exception exception) {
        this.type = type;
        this.session = session;
        this.mojoExecution = mojoExecution;

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

    )
  }

  internal fun formattedType(type: Int): String = if (type < FRAME_NAMES.size) FRAME_NAMES[type] else format("0x%02x", type)

  /**
   * Looks up valid string representing flags from the table. Invalid combinations are represented
   * in binary.
   */
  fun formatFlags(
    type: Int,
    flags: Int,
  ): String {
    if (flags == 0) return ""
    when (type) {

	"database/sql"
	"database/sql/driver"
	"go/ast"
	"reflect"
)

// Expression expression interface
type Expression interface {
	Build(builder Builder)
}

// NegationExpressionBuilder negation expression builder
type NegationExpressionBuilder interface {
	NegationBuild(builder Builder)
}

// Expr raw expression
type Expr struct {
	SQL                string
	Vars               []interface{}
	WithoutParentheses bool
}