return next;
      }
    }
    return null;
  }

  /**
   * Determines whether two iterables contain equal elements in the same order. More specifically,
   * this method returns {@code true} if {@code iterable1} and {@code iterable2} contain the same
   * number of elements and every element of {@code iterable1} is equal to the corresponding element
   * of {@code iterable2}.
   */

   *
   * @param multimap the presumed-immutable multimap
   * @param sampleKey a key of the same type as that contained by {@code multimap}. {@code multimap}
   *     may or may not have {@code sampleKey} as a key.
   * @param sampleValue a key of the same type as that contained by {@code multimap}. {@code
   *     multimap} may or may not have {@code sampleValue} as a key.
   */

 *       they appear. Input data is never modified. {@link HashFunction} instances should always be
 *       stateless, and therefore thread-safe.
 *   <li><b>collision-averse:</b> while it can't be helped that a hash function will sometimes
 *       produce the same hash code for distinct inputs (a "collision"), every hash function strives
 *       to <i>some</i> degree to make this unlikely. (Without this condition, a function that

 *       they appear. Input data is never modified. {@link HashFunction} instances should always be
 *       stateless, and therefore thread-safe.
 *   <li><b>collision-averse:</b> while it can't be helped that a hash function will sometimes
 *       produce the same hash code for distinct inputs (a "collision"), every hash function strives
 *       to <i>some</i> degree to make this unlikely. (Without this condition, a function that

By only using `BackgroundTasks` (and not `BackgroundTask`), it's then possible to use it as a *path operation function* parameter and have **FastAPI** handle the rest for you, just like when using the `Request` object directly.

It's still possible to use `BackgroundTask` alone in FastAPI, but you have to create the object in your code and return a Starlette `Response` including it.

  @Override
  public ImmutableGraph<N> asGraph() {
    return new ImmutableGraph<>(this); // safe because the view is effectively immutable
  }

  private static <N, V> ImmutableMap<N, GraphConnections<N, V>> getNodeConnections(
      ValueGraph<N, V> graph) {
    // ImmutableMap.Builder maintains the order of the elements as inserted, so the map will have
    // whatever ordering the graph's nodes do, so ImmutableSortedMap is unnecessary even if the

whether these uses were recommended or considered safe, or where we recommend
some form of isolation when dealing with untrusted data. As a result, this
document also outlines what issues we consider as TensorFlow security
vulnerabilities.

We recognize issues as vulnerabilities only when they occur in scenarios that we
outline as safe; issues that have a security impact only when TensorFlow is used

   * file. For discussion, see AbstractFutureState.
   */

  // Lazily initialized the first time we see an exception; not released until all the input futures
  // have completed and we have processed them all.
  volatile @Nullable Set<Throwable> seenExceptionsField = null;

  volatile int remainingField;

  private static final AtomicHelper ATOMIC_HELPER;

 * implementing {@code Map}, the additional type-safe operations {@link #putInstance} and {@link
 * #getInstance} are available.
 *
 * <p>Generally, implementations don't support {@link #put} and {@link #putAll} because there is no
 * way to check an object at runtime to be an instance of a {@link TypeToken}. Instead, caller
 * should use the type safe {@link #putInstance}.
 *

 * implementing {@code Map}, the additional type-safe operations {@link #putInstance} and {@link
 * #getInstance} are available.
 *
 * <p>Generally, implementations don't support {@link #put} and {@link #putAll} because there is no
 * way to check an object at runtime to be an instance of a {@link TypeToken}. Instead, caller
 * should use the type safe {@link #putInstance}.
 *