@Override
    public Entry<String, Integer>[] createArray(int length) {
      return (Entry<String, Integer>[]) new Entry<?, ?>[length];
    }

    @Override
    public Iterable<Entry<String, Integer>> order(List<Entry<String, Integer>> insertionOrder) {
      return insertionOrder;
    }

    @Override
    public List<Entry<String, Integer>> create(Object... elements) {

		{"SHØRT", 49},
		{"There are far too many object names, and far too few bucket names!", 8},
		{"a/b/c/", 159},
		{"/a/b/c", 96},
		{string([]byte{0xff, 0xfe, 0xfd}), 147},
	}

	// Tests hashing order to be consistent.
	for i, testCase := range testCases {
		if sipHashElement := hashKey("SIPMOD", testCase.objectName, 200, testUUID); sipHashElement != testCase.sipHash {

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return "Doubles.lexicographicalComparator()";
    }
  }

  /**
   * Sorts the elements of {@code array} in descending order.
   *
   * <p>Note that this method uses the total order imposed by {@link Double#compare}, which treats
   * all NaN values as equal and 0.0 as greater than -0.0.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */

 *        h
 *      / | \
 *     /  e  \
 *    d       g
 *   /|\      |
 *  / | \     f
 * a  b  c
 * }
 *
 * <p>can be iterated over in preorder (hdabcegf), postorder (abcdefgh), or breadth-first order
 * (hdegabcf).
 *
 * <p>Null nodes are strictly forbidden.
 *
 * <p>Because this is an abstract class, not an interface, you can't use a lambda expression to
 * implement it:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * // won't work

            assertEquals(manyDialects[i], SMBUtil.readInt2(buffer, 24 + i * 2));
        }
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test encode preserves dialect order")
    void testEncodePreservesDialectOrder() {
        // Use dialects in specific order
        int[] orderedDialects = new int[] { 0x0311, 0x0302, 0x0300, 0x0210, 0x0202 };

        ValidateNegotiateInfoRequest request =

    @Override
    public Entry<String, Integer>[] createArray(int length) {
      return (Entry<String, Integer>[]) new Entry<?, ?>[length];
    }

    @Override
    public Iterable<Entry<String, Integer>> order(List<Entry<String, Integer>> insertionOrder) {
      return new Ordering<Entry<String, Integer>>() {
        @Override
        public int compare(Entry<String, Integer> left, Entry<String, Integer> right) {

	sum64 := siphash.Hash(k0, k1, []byte(key))
	return int(sum64 % uint64(cardinality))
}

// hashOrder - hashes input key to return consistent
// hashed integer slice. Returned integer order is salted
// with an input key. This results in consistent order.
// NOTE: collisions are fine, we are not looking for uniqueness
// in the slices returned.
func hashOrder(key string, cardinality int) []int {
	if cardinality <= 0 {

  @Nullable ReferenceEntry<K, V> getNext();

  /** Returns the entry's hash. */
  int getHash();

  /** Returns the key for this entry. */
  @Nullable K getKey();

  /*
   * Used by entries that use access order. Access entries are maintained in a doubly-linked list.
   * New entries are added at the tail of the list at write time; stale entries are expired from
   * the head of the list.
   */

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Utilities for benchmarks.
 *
 * <p>In many cases, we wish to vary the order of magnitude of the input as much as we want to vary
 * the input itself, so most methods which generate values use an exponential distribution varying
 * the order of magnitude of the generated values uniformly at random.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@NullUnmarked
final class MathBenchmarking {

  @CollectionFeature.Require({SUPPORTS_ITERATOR_REMOVE, KNOWN_ORDER})
  public void testRemovingIteratorKnownOrder() {
    new IteratorTester<E>(
        4,
        MODIFIABLE,
        getSubjectGenerator().order(asList(e0(), e1(), e1(), e2())),
        IteratorTester.KnownOrder.KNOWN_ORDER) {
      @Override
      protected Iterator<E> newTargetIterator() {
        return getSubjectGenerator().create(e0(), e1(), e1(), e2()).iterator();