while (properties.hasNext()) {
            final Map.Entry property = (Map.Entry) properties.next();
            final String key = (String) property.getKey();
            final StringBuilder value = new StringBuilder();
            final Iterator values = ((List) property.getValue()).iterator();
            while (values.hasNext()) {
                value.append(values.next());

                            <la:form action="/admin/searchlist" styleClass="form-inline" method="GET">
                                <div class="form-group">
                                    <la:text styleClass="query form-control" property="q"
                                             title="Search" size="50" maxlength="1000"
                                             placeholder="Type a search query"/>
                                </div>

        </executions>
      </plugin>
    </plugins>
  </build>

  <profiles>
    <profile>
      <id>create-distribution-in-dir</id>
      <activation>
        <property>
          <name>distributionTargetDir</name>
        </property>
      </activation>
      <build>
        <plugins>
          <plugin>
            <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>

 * similar to the way Maven configures plugins from the POM, i.e. some configuration like {@code <param>value</param>}
 * is mapped to an equally named property of the bean and converted. The properties of the bean are supposed to either
 * have a public setter or be backed by an equally named field (of any visibility).
 *
 * @since 3.0
 */
public interface BeanConfigurator {

    //                                                                    Property Gateway
    //                                                                    ================
    // -----------------------------------------------------
    //                                       Column Property
    //                                       ---------------

tasks.withType<Test> {
  useJUnitPlatform()
  onlyIf("By default not in CI") {
    System.getenv("CI") == null
      || (project.hasProperty("containerTests") && project.property("containerTests").toString().toBoolean())
  }

  jvmArgs(
    "-Dokhttp.platform=$platform",
  )

  if (platform == "loom") {
    jvmArgs(
      "-Djdk.tracePinnedThreads=short",
    )
  }

 defined the maven.multiproject.includes property in any of his properties
 files for the current project. if yes. then I'm able to find projects that
 can be offered to be opened together with the current project.
 problems with the current solution are:
 1. information is duplicate. once in POM's dependencies and once in the
 maven.multiproject.includes property.

   * changes).
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<Object, Collection<Object>> asMap() {
    return super.asMap();
  }

  private Object readResolve() {
    return INSTANCE; // preserve singleton property
  }

  @GwtIncompatible @J2ktIncompatible private static final long serialVersionUID = 0;

 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.eventspy;

import java.util.Map;

/**
 * A core extension to monitor Maven's execution. Typically, such an extension gets loaded into Maven by specifying the
 * property {@code maven.ext.class.path} on the command line. As soon as dependency injection is set up, Maven
 * looks up all implementers of this interface and calls their {@link #init(Context)} method. Note:

            schemaFactory.setProperty(XMLConstants.ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD, "");
        } catch (final Exception e) {
            if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                logger.debug("Failed to set a property.", e);
            }
        }
    }