suggester.removeDisableIndices();       // Cleanup old indices
```

**Async Operations:**
```java
suggester.suggest()
    .setQuery("search")
    .execute()
    .done(response -> { /* handle success */ })
    .error(throwable -> { /* handle error */ });
```

---

## Important Notes

### Thread Safety
- **Suggester**: Thread-safe for queries

		defer cancel()

		wg := sync.WaitGroup{}
		for i, disk := range disks {
			if disk == nil {
				done <- false
				continue
			}
			if !disk.IsOnline() {
				done <- false
				continue
			}
			wg.Add(1)
			go func(i int, disk StorageAPI) {
				defer wg.Done()

				var (
					fi  FileInfo
					rfi RawFileInfo
					err error
				)

				if opts.VersionID != "" {

		// current stack snapshot matches the initial one, no leaks, return.
		if len(leaked) == 0 {
			return
		}
		// wait a test again will deadline.
		if UTCNow().Before(deadline) {
			time.Sleep(leakDetectPauseTimeMs * time.Millisecond)
			continue
		}
		// after the deadline time report all the difference in the latest snapshot compared with the initial one.
		for _, g := range leaked {

For example, RAID6 can protect against two drive failure whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects incrementally. Storage servers once deployed should not require drive replacement or healing for the...

			}
		}
		m.tlock.RUnlock()
	}
	return report
}

func (m *Monitor) trackEWMA() {
	for {
		select {
		case <-m.bucketMovingAvgTicker.C:
			m.updateMovingAvg()
		case <-m.ctx.Done():
			return
		}
	}
}

func (m *Monitor) updateMovingAvg() {
	m.mlock.Lock()
	defer m.mlock.Unlock()
	for _, bucketMeasurement := range m.bucketsMeasurement {

	}
	r.onReaderExit = func() {
		close(r.decoded)
		readCloser.Close()
		for range r.input {
			// Read until EOF trickles through.
			// Otherwise, we risk the decoder hanging.
		}
		r.readerWg.Done()
	}

	// We cannot reuse as we are sending parsed objects elsewhere.
	simdjson.ParseNDStream(readCloser, r.input, nil)
	r.readerWg.Add(1)
	go r.startReader()
	return &r
}

}

func (w *writerWrapper) Write(p []byte) (n int, err error) {
	buf := GetByteBufferCap(len(p))
	buf = buf[:len(p)]
	copy(buf, p)
	select {
	case w.ch <- buf:
		return len(p), nil
	case <-w.ctx.Done():
		return 0, context.Cause(w.ctx)
	}
}

// WriterToChannel will return an io.Writer that writes to the given channel.
// The context both allows returning errors on writes and to ensure that

       *   setFuture called on it: Neither of those can happen until we've finished processing all
       *   the completed inputs. And we're still processing at least one input, the one that
       *   triggered handleException.)
       *
       * TODO(cpovirk): Think about whether we could/should use Verify to check the return value of
       * addCausalChain.
       */

d))for(r in f&&1===e.nodeType&&(n.overflow=[h.overflow,h.overflowX,h.overflowY],null==(l=v&&v.display)&&(l=_.get(e,"display")),"none"===(c=ce.css(e,"display"))&&(l?c=l:(re([e],!0),l=e.style.display||l,c=ce.css(e,"display"),re([e]))),("inline"===c||"inline-block"===c&&null!=l)&&"none"===ce.css(e,"float")&&(u||(p.done(function(){h.display=l}),null==l&&(c=h.display,l="none"===c?"":c)),h.display="inline-block")),n.overflow&&(h.overflow="hidden",p.always(function(){h.overflow=n.overflow[0],h.overflow...

    port = serverSocket!!.localPort
    executor.execute {
      try {
        readAndWriteFrames()
      } catch (e: IOException) {
        ******@****.***uietly()
        logger.info("${this@MockHttp2Peer} done: ${e.message}")
      }
    }
  }

  private fun readAndWriteFrames() {
    check(socket == null)
    val socket = serverSocket!!.accept()!!
    this.socket = socket