* Fixes [#49418](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/49418) where kube-controller-manager can panic on volume.CanSupport methods and enter a crash loop. ([#49420](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/49420), [@gnufied](https://github.com/gnufied))

		}
	}
</pre>

<h3 id="Continue_statements">Continue statements</h3>

<p>
A "continue" statement begins the next iteration of the
innermost <a href="#For_statements">"for" loop</a> at its post statement.
The "for" loop must be within the same function.
</p>

<pre class="ebnf">
ContinueStmt = "continue" [ Label ] .
</pre>

<p>
If there is a label, it must be that of an enclosing

		}

		written, err := erasure.Decode(ctx, writer, readers, partOffset, partLength, partSize, prefer)
		// Note: we should not be defer'ing the following closeBitrotReaders() call as
		// we are inside a for loop i.e if we use defer, we would accumulate a lot of open files by the time
		// we return from this function.
		closeBitrotReaders(readers)
		if err != nil {
			// If we have successfully written all the content that was asked

            if ( ( b = this.in.read() ) == -1 )
                return null;
            this.sbuf[ 35 ] = (byte) b;
        }

        /*
         * Unless key returned is null or invalid Transport.loop() always
         * calls doRecv() after and no one else but the transport thread
         * should call doRecv(). Therefore it is ok to expect that the data
         * in sbuf will be preserved for copying into BUF in doRecv().

   *       RuntimeException} ({@code get} implementations are discouraged from throwing such
   *       exceptions).
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>The overall principle is to eliminate all checked exceptions: to loop to avoid {@code
   * InterruptedException}, to pass through {@code CancellationException}, and to wrap any exception
   * from the underlying computation in an {@code UncheckedExecutionException} or {@code
   * ExecutionError}.

// initDataScanner will start the scanner in the background.
func initDataScanner(ctx context.Context, objAPI ObjectLayer) {
	go func() {
		r := rand.New(rand.NewSource(time.Now().UnixNano()))
		// Run the data scanner in a loop
		for {
			runDataScanner(ctx, objAPI)
			duration := time.Duration(r.Float64() * float64(scannerCycle.Load()))
			if duration < time.Second {
				// Make sure to sleep at least a second to avoid high CPU ticks.

    String string = sequence.toString();
    int pos = indexIn(string);
    if (pos == -1) {
      return string;
    }

    char[] chars = string.toCharArray();
    int spread = 1;

    // This unusual loop comes from extensive benchmarking
    OUT:
    while (true) {
      pos++;
      while (true) {
        if (pos == chars.length) {
          break OUT;
        }
        if (matches(chars[pos])) {

    * The vSphere cloud provider has a cleanup function with a loop,
    * inside of which a write lock was intended to prevent races against
    * VM creation, but the usage of the sync.RWMutex type is incorrect,
    * plus is placed in a defer call so the locking is effectively
    * nonexistent.  This patch adds an anonymous function call inside
    * the loop to correctly handle acquiring the write lock with deferred

## Changelog since v1.8.9

### Other notable changes

* gce: fixes race condition in ServiceController, where nodes weren't updated in the node sync loop, by updating TargetPools in the ensureExternalLoadBalancer call. ([#58368](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/58368), [@MrHohn](https://github.com/MrHohn))

}

// DeletePolicy - deletes a canned policy from backend. `notifyPeers` is true
// whenever this is called via the API. It is false when called via a
// notification from another peer. This is to avoid infinite loops.
func (sys *IAMSys) DeletePolicy(ctx context.Context, policyName string, notifyPeers bool) error {
	if !sys.Initialized() {
		return errServerNotInitialized
	}

	for _, v := range policy.DefaultPolicies {