A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.

**Screenshots**
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

**Environment (please complete the following information):**
 - OS: [e.g. Windows 10]
 - Version [e.g. 13.5.0]

**Additional context**

blank_issues_enabled: false
contact_links:
  - name: Security Contact
    about: Please report security vulnerabilities to ******@****.***
  - name: Question or Problem
    about: Ask a question or ask about a problem in GitHub Discussions.
    url: https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/discussions/categories/questions
  - name: Feature Request

Provide a reproducible test case that is the bare minimum necessary to generate
the problem. If possible, please share a link to Colab/Jupyter/any notebook.

Also, please include a link to a GraphDef or the model if possible.

**Any other info / logs**

Include any logs or source code that would be helpful to diagnose the problem.
If including tracebacks, please include the full traceback. Large logs and files

     * the <code>Mojo</code> to communicate errors.
     *
     * @throws MojoExecutionException if an unexpected problem occurs.
     * Throwing this exception causes a "BUILD ERROR" message to be displayed.
     * @throws MojoFailureException if an expected problem (such as a compilation failure) occurs.
     * Throwing this exception causes a "BUILD FAILURE" message to be displayed.
     */

   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem
   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either

   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem
   * without having to add {@code @SuppressWarnings}, the code can call this method.
   *
   * <p>Why <i>not</i> just add {@code SuppressWarnings}? The problem is that this method is
   * typically useful for {@code return} statements. That leaves the code with two options: Either

  return when {
    // If there was a protocol problem, don't recover.
    e is ProtocolException -> false

    // If there was an interruption or timeout (SocketTimeoutException), don't recover.
    // For the socket connect timeout case we do not try the same host with a different
    // ConnectionSpec: we assume it is unreachable.
    e is InterruptedIOException -> false

                .findFirst()
                .get();
        assertEquals("0.3", dep.getVersion());
        assertEquals(1, result.getProblems().size());
        ModelProblem problem = result.getProblems().get(0);
        assertTrue(problem.toString().contains("Ignored POM import"));
    }

    /**
     * This test has
     *   - a BOM import which itself imports the junit BOM which manages the dep to 0.1

      e is FileNotFoundException
  }

  private fun isRecoverable(
    e: IOException,
    requestSendStarted: Boolean,
  ): Boolean {
    // If there was a protocol problem, don't recover.
    if (e is ProtocolException) {
      return false
    }

    // If there was an interruption don't recover, but if there was a timeout connecting to a route

---
name: Feature request
about: Suggest an idea
title: ''
labels: enhancement
assignees: ''

---

Start by telling us what problem you’re trying to solve. Often a solution already exists!