| InvocationTargetException
                        | IllegalAccessException
                        | InstantiationException ex) {
                    // ignore and move on to the next
                }
            }
        } catch (IOException ex) {
            // ignore
        }

        return new UnsupportedSlf4jBindingConfiguration();
    }

    Iterator<? extends T> it = iterable.iterator();
    if (it.hasNext()) {
      T prev = it.next();
      while (it.hasNext()) {
        T next = it.next();
        if (compare(prev, next) > 0) {
          return false;
        }
        prev = next;
      }
    }
    return true;
  }

  /**

 * A utility for testing an Iterator implementation by comparing its behavior to that of a "known
 * good" reference implementation. In order to accomplish this, it's important to test a great
 * variety of sequences of the {@link Iterator#next}, {@link Iterator#hasNext} and {@link
 * Iterator#remove} operations. This utility takes the brute-force approach of trying <i>all</i>
 * possible sequences of these operations, up to a given number of steps. So, if the caller

            boolean result = testRequest.allowChain(nextRequest);

            assertFalse(result);
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("getNext should return next request")
        void testGetNext() {
            TestServerMessageBlock2Request nextRequest = new TestServerMessageBlock2Request(mockConfig);
            testRequest.setNext(nextRequest);

        if (r1.size() != r2.size()) {
            return false;
        }

        for (Iterator<ArtifactRepository> it1 = r1.iterator(), it2 = r2.iterator(); it1.hasNext(); ) {
            if (!repositoryEquals(it1.next(), it2.next())) {
                return false;
            }
        }

        return true;
    }

    /**
     * CacheRecord
     */
    public class CacheRecord {

    Iterator<String> keyIterator = keys.iterator();
    keyIterator.next();
    keyIterator.remove();
    assertFalse(underlying.containsKey("c"));

    Collection<String> values = map.values();
    values.remove("4");
    assertFalse(underlying.containsKey("d"));

    Iterator<String> valueIterator = values.iterator();
    valueIterator.next();
    valueIterator.remove();
    assertFalse(underlying.containsKey("e"));

So, it will send the first item, the client will receive and start processing it, and you might still be producing the next item.

```mermaid
sequenceDiagram
    participant App
    participant Client

    App->>App: Produce Item 1
    App->>Client: Send Item 1
    App->>App: Produce Item 2
    Client->>Client: Process Item 1

    Iterator<?> expectedIter = expected.iterator();
    Iterator<?> actualIter = actual.iterator();

    while (expectedIter.hasNext() && actualIter.hasNext()) {
      if (!equal(expectedIter.next(), actualIter.next())) {
        fail(
            "contents were not equal and in the same order: "
                + "expected = "
                + expected
                + ", actual = "
                + actual);

   * prev}. {@code ENDPOINT} represents either the first or last entry in the entire map (as
   * appropriate).
   */
  private void setSucceeds(int prev, int next) {
    if (prev == ENDPOINT) {
      firstInInsertionOrder = next;
    } else {
      nextInInsertionOrder[prev] = next;
    }
    if (next == ENDPOINT) {
      lastInInsertionOrder = prev;

    private String generateRegistrationId() {
        return "REG-" + System.currentTimeMillis() + "-" + Integer.toHexString(System.identityHashCode(this));
    }

    /**
     * Gets the next sequence number for this registration.
     *
     * @return the next sequence number
     */
    public long getNextSequenceNumber() {
        return sequenceNumber.incrementAndGet();
    }

    /**