}

      return Range.create(lowerBound, upperBound);
    }

    @Override
    boolean isPartialView() {
      return true;
    }

    // redeclare to help optimizers with b/310253115
    @SuppressWarnings("RedundantOverride")
    @Override
    @J2ktIncompatible // serialization
    Object writeReplace() {
      return super.writeReplace();
    }
  }

    //                                                                              ======
    /**
     * Sets up HTML data for rendering, including help link.
     *
     * @param runtime the action runtime
     */
    @Override
    protected void setupHtmlData(final ActionRuntime runtime) {
        super.setupHtmlData(runtime);

The whole **FastAPI** framework is based to satisfy that. Autocompletion works everywhere.

You will rarely need to come back to the docs.

Here's how your editor might help you:

* in <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Visual Studio Code</a>:

![editor support](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/vscode-completion.png)

Example:

    Source (English):

        «««
        [Create Pull Requests](help-fastapi.md#create-a-pull-request){.internal-link target=_blank}
        »»»

    Result (German):

        «««
        [Pull Requests erzeugen](help-fastapi.md#create-a-pull-request){.internal-link target=_blank}
        »»»

Durch das ✨ [**Sponsoring von FastAPI**](../help-fastapi.md#sponsor-the-author){.internal-link target=_blank} ✨ helfen diese Unternehmen sicherzustellen, dass das Framework und sein **Ökosystem** gesund und **nachhaltig** bleiben.

Ao ✨ [**patrocinar o FastAPI**](../help-fastapi.md#sponsor-the-author){.internal-link target=_blank} ✨, essas empresas ajudam a garantir que o framework e seu **ecossistema** continuem saudáveis e **sustentáveis**.

But in this case, if you could bring the 8 ex-cashier/cooks/now-cleaners, and each one of them (plus you) could take a zone of the house to clean it, you could do all the work in **parallel**, with the extra help, and finish much sooner.

In this scenario, each one of the cleaners (including you) would be a processor, doing their part of the job.

        Entry<?, ?> entry = (Entry<?, ?>) object;
        return multimap.containsEntry(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
      }
      return false;
    }

    // redeclare to help optimizers with b/310253115
    @SuppressWarnings("RedundantOverride")
    @Override
    @J2ktIncompatible
    @GwtIncompatible
        Object writeReplace() {
      return super.writeReplace();
    }

explicitly in Go to pointers to arrays, as they do (implicitly) in C.

Garbage collection is the big problem.  It is fine for the Go world to
have pointers into the C world and to free those pointers when they
are no longer needed.  To help, the Go code can define Go objects
holding the C pointers and use runtime.SetFinalizer on those Go objects.

It is much more difficult for the C world to have pointers into the Go

        Entry<?, ?> entry = (Entry<?, ?>) object;
        return multimap.containsEntry(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
      }
      return false;
    }

    // redeclare to help optimizers with b/310253115
    @SuppressWarnings("RedundantOverride")
    @Override
    @J2ktIncompatible
    @GwtIncompatible
        Object writeReplace() {
      return super.writeReplace();
    }