Instances of abusive, harassing, or otherwise unacceptable behavior may be
reported by contacting the project team at ******@****.***. The project team
will review and investigate all complaints, and will respond in a way that it deems
appropriate to the circumstances. The project team is obligated to maintain
confidentiality with regard to the reporter of an incident.
Further details of specific enforcement policies may be posted separately.

    public RankFusionSearcher() {
        // Default constructor - name will be initialized lazily
    }

    /**
     * Returns the name of this searcher.
     * The name is derived from the class name by converting it to lowercase
     * and removing the "Searcher" suffix.
     *
     * @return the searcher name
     */
    public String getName() {
        if (name == null) {

  /**
   * Returns the next element in the iteration, without advancing the iteration.
   *
   * <p>Calls to {@code peek()} should not change the state of the iteration, except that it
   * <i>may</i> prevent removal of the most recent element via {@link #remove()}.
   *
   * @throws NoSuchElementException if the iteration has no more elements according to {@link
   *     #hasNext()}
   */

 * }
 * }
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 * @since 12.0
 */
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could

                if (propValue.startsWith("!")) {
                    reverseValue = true;
                    propValue = propValue.substring(1);
                }

                // we have a value, so it has to match the system value...
                boolean result = propValue.equals(sysValue);

                if (reverseValue) {
                    return !result;
                } else {

    //
    // p4 inherits from p3
    // p3 inherits from p2
    // p2 inherits from p1
    // p1 inherits from p0
    // p0 inherits from super model
    //
    // or we can show it graphically as:
    //
    // p4 ---> p3 ---> p2 ---> p1 ---> p0 --> super model
    //
    // ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    @Test

    // ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    //
    // p1 inherits from p0
    // p0 inherits from super model
    //
    // or we can show it graphically as:
    //
    // p1 ---> p0 --> super model
    //
    // ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    @Test
    void testDependencyManagement() throws Exception {

    thread1.join();
    thread2.join();
    assertEquals(1, runCalled.get());
  }

  public void testAddAfterRun() throws Exception {
    // Run the previous test
    testRunOnPopulatedList();

    // If it passed, then verify an Add will be executed without calling run
    CountDownLatch countDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);
    list.add(new MockRunnable(countDownLatch), newCachedThreadPool());

              logger.severe("InterruptenatorTask did not exit; future tests may be affected");
              /*
               * This won't do any good under JUnit 3, but I'll leave it around in
               * case we ever switch to JUnit 4:
               */
              fail();
            }
          }
        });
  }

     * @return file representing the tool executable, or null if the tool cannot be found
     */
    String findTool(String toolName);

    /**
     * Let the toolchain decide if it matches requirements defined
     * in the toolchain plugin configuration.
     *
     * @param requirements key value pair, may not be {@code null}
     * @return {@code true} if the requirements match, otherwise {@code false}