int TF_OutputListNumOutputs(TF_OutputList* o);
// Return the `i`th output in the list.
TF_AbstractTensor* TF_OutputListGet(TF_OutputList* o, int i);
// Append a tensor at the end of the output list, growing its size by one.
void TF_OutputListPushBack(TF_OutputList* o, TF_AbstractTensor* tensor,
                           TF_Status*);

// TF_ExecuteOperation will, if in eager mode, execute, if in graph mode, maybe

   * Returns a new instance with the same type and subtype as this instance, with the {@code
   * charset} parameter set to the {@link Charset#name name} of the given charset. Only one {@code
   * charset} parameter will be present on the new instance regardless of the number set on this
   * one.
   *
   * <p>If a charset must be specified that is not supported on this JVM (and thus is not

        for (int i = 0; i < elements.length; i++) {
          String element = elements[i];
          if (multiset1.contains(element) || multiset2.contains(element)) {
            // add to both; the one already containing it will have more
            multiset1.add(element);
            multiset2.add(element);
          } else if (i % 2 == 0) {
            multiset1.add(elements[i]);
          } else {

      implements TestMapGenerator<String, Collection<Integer>> {

    @Override
    public SampleElements<Entry<String, Collection<Integer>>> samples() {
      return new SampleElements<>(
          mapEntry("one", collectionOf(10000)),
          mapEntry("two", collectionOf(-2000)),
          mapEntry("three", collectionOf(300)),
          mapEntry("four", collectionOf(-40)),
          mapEntry("five", collectionOf(5)));
    }

              public Multiset apply(Multiset delegate) {
                return wrap(delegate);
              }
            });
  }

  public void testEquals() {
    Multiset<String> set1 = ImmutableMultiset.of("one");
    Multiset<String> set2 = ImmutableMultiset.of("two");
    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(set1, wrap(set1), wrap(set1))
        .addEqualityGroup(set2, wrap(set2))
        .testEquals();
  }

  protected abstract HashCode makeHash();

  // Process pent-up data in chunks
  private void munchIfFull() {
    if (buffer.remaining() < 8) {
      // buffer is full; not enough room for a primitive. We have at least one full chunk.
      munch();
    }
  }

  private void munch() {
    Java8Compatibility.flip(buffer);
    while (buffer.remaining() >= chunkSize) {

/*
 * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
 * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
 * distributed with this work for additional information
 * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
 * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
 * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
 * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *

~~ Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
~~ or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
~~ distributed with this work for additional information
~~ regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
~~ to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
~~ "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
~~ with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
~~
~~ http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

   * unequivocally demonstrate that funneling cannot be occurring. This is done bit-by-bit. For each
   * input bit(i) and output bit(j), two pairs of keys must be found with all bits identical except
   * bit(i). One pair must differ in output bit(j), and one pair must not. This proves that input
   * bit(i) can alter output bit(j).
   */
  static void checkNoFunnels(HashFunction function) {
    Random rand = new Random(0);
    int keyBits = 32;

        }
        Type[] resolvedBounds = new TypeResolver(forDependants).resolveTypes(bounds);
        /*
         * We'd like to simply create our own TypeVariable with the newly resolved bounds. There's
         * just one problem: Starting with JDK 7u51, the JDK TypeVariable's equals() method doesn't
         * recognize instances of our TypeVariable implementation. This is a problem because users