}
    if (testsEquals) {
      testEquals(interfaceType, wrapperFunction);
    }
    testToString(interfaceType, wrapperFunction);
  }

  /** Returns the most concrete public methods from {@code type}. */
  private static Method[] getMostConcreteMethods(Class<?> type) {
    Method[] methods = type.getMethods();
    for (int i = 0; i < methods.length; i++) {
      try {

 * This class contains a Kotlin implementation of the pseudocode specified by RFC 3492. It includes
 * direct translation of the pseudocode presented there.
 *
 * Partner this class with [UTS #46] to implement IDNA2008 [RFC 5890] like most browsers do.
 *
 * [RFC 3492]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3492
 * [RFC 5890]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5890
 * [UTS #46]: https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr46/
 */
object Punycode {

 *
 * We strongly suggest that you create an explicit {@link jcifs.context.CIFSContextWrapper}
 * with your desired config. It's base implementation {@link jcifs.context.BaseContext}
 * should be sufficient for most needs.
 *
 * If you want to retain the classic singleton behavior you can use
 * {@link jcifs.context.SingletonContext#getInstance()}
 * witch is initialized using system properties.
 *
 */
public class Config {

 *
 * <p>The <dfn>Dependency graph flattening</dfn> process in Maven reduces a complex,
 * multi-level dependency graph to a map of ordered lists that can be turned into classpaths.
 * During this process only the most relevant version of each artifact
 * (based on group ID and artifact ID) is retained, resolving conflicts and eliminating duplicates to ensure
 * that each dependency is included only once in the final build.</p>
 *

    }
    if (testsEquals) {
      testEquals(interfaceType, wrapperFunction);
    }
    testToString(interfaceType, wrapperFunction);
  }

  /** Returns the most concrete public methods from {@code type}. */
  private static Method[] getMostConcreteMethods(Class<?> type) {
    Method[] methods = type.getMethods();
    for (int i = 0; i < methods.length; i++) {
      try {

But you would get the same editor support with <a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/" class="external-link" target="_blank">PyCharm</a> and most of the other Python editors:

<img src="/img/tutorial/body/image05.png">

/// tip

   *
   * <p>The resulting set of edges will be parallel (i.e. have equal {@link
   * #incidentNodes(Object)}). If this network does not {@link #allowsParallelEdges() allow parallel
   * edges}, the resulting set will contain at most one edge (equivalent to {@code
   * edgeConnecting(nodeU, nodeV).asSet()}).
   *
   * <p>If either {@code nodeU} or {@code nodeV} are removed from the network after this method is

   * (key) bits 'affects' a strictly smaller set of output bits. Funneling is bad because it can
   * result in more-than-ideal collisions for a non-uniformly distributed key space. In practice,
   * most key spaces are ANYTHING BUT uniformly distributed. A bit(i) in the input is said to
   * 'affect' a bit(j) in the output if two inputs, identical but for bit(i), will differ at output
   * bit(j) about half the time
   *

## Previous tools { #previous-tools }

### <a href="https://www.djangoproject.com/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Django</a> { #django }

It's the most popular Python framework and is widely trusted. It is used to build systems like Instagram.

   * @return the number of characters copied
   * @throws IOException if an I/O error occurs
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public static long copy(Readable from, Appendable to) throws IOException {
    // The most common case is that from is a Reader (like InputStreamReader or StringReader) so
    // take advantage of that.
    if (from instanceof Reader) {
      // optimize for common output types which are optimized to deal with char[]