* in a {@code Map<R, Map<C, V>>}. A method call like {@code column(columnKey).get(rowKey)} still
   * runs quickly, since the row key is provided. However, {@code column(columnKey).size()} takes
   * longer, since an iteration across all row keys occurs.
   *
   * <p>Note that this implementation is not synchronized. If multiple threads access this table

        .webSocketUpgrade(serverListener)
        .build(),
    )
    val webSocket: WebSocket = newWebSocket()
    clientListener.assertOpen()
    val server = serverListener.assertOpen()

    // Sleep longer than the HTTP client's read timeout.
    Thread.sleep((client.readTimeoutMillis + 500).toLong())
    server.send("abc")
    clientListener.assertTextMessage("abc")
    closeWebSockets(webSocket, server)
  }

- Kubeadm: the `kubelet-finalize` phase of `kubeadm init` no longer requires the kubelet kubeconfig to have a specific authinfo. ([#123171](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/123171), [@vrutkovs](https://github.com/vrutkovs))

            if (ssn != null) {
                ssn.removeAttribute("npa-" + server);
            }
            if (sae.getNtStatus() == NtStatus.NT_STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION) {
                /* Server challenge no longer valid for
                 * externally supplied password hashes.
                 */
                resp.sendRedirect(req.getRequestURL().toString());
                return;
            }

            return;
        } finally {
            synchronized (run_thread) {
                if (run_thread != this.thread) {
                    /*
                     * Thread no longer the one setup for this transport --
                     * doConnect returned too late, just ignore.
                     */
                    if (ex0 instanceof SocketTimeoutException) {

        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should not be equal with different pathConsumed")
        void testNotEqualDifferentPathConsumed() {
            String reqPath = "\\\\server\\share\\path\\longer\\path";
            when(mockReferral.getNode()).thenReturn("\\server\\share\\path");
            DfsReferralDataImpl other = DfsReferralDataImpl.fromReferral(mockReferral, reqPath, System.currentTimeMillis() + 10000,

What’s changing now:

* 🚫 We’re no longer accepting new community-submitted translation PRs.

* ⏳ Existing open PRs will be reviewed and can still be merged if completed within the next 3 weeks (since July 11 2025).

   *       without trouble. In this case, my guess is that our chosen approach is even less likely
   *       to lead to trouble than an incompatible change would be.
   *   <li>We could make {@link #countMap} no longer be {@code final}. Then we could write to it
   *       directly during deserialization. However, we would lose Java's guarantees for {@code
   *       final} fields, including that their values are guaranteed to be visible even when an

 *       ImmutableList#subList} may retain a reference to the entire data set, preventing it from
 *       being garbage collected. If some of the data is no longer reachable through other means,
 *       this constitutes a memory leak. Pass the view collection to the appropriate {@code copyOf}
 *       method to obtain a correctly-sized copy.

      return true;
    }
  }

  /**
   * Per <a href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/1635">issue 1635</a>, In JDK 1.7.0_51-b13,
   * {@link TypeVariableImpl#equals(Object)} is changed to no longer be equal to custom TypeVariable
   * implementations. As a result, we need to make sure our TypeVariable implementation respects
   * symmetry. Moreover, we don't want to reconstruct a native type variable {@code <A>} using our