*   <dt>{@link BiMap}
 *   <dd>An extension of {@link java.util.Map} that guarantees the uniqueness of its values as well
 *       as that of its keys. This is sometimes called an "invertible map," since the restriction on
 *       values enables it to support an {@linkplain BiMap#inverse inverse view} -- which is another
 *       instance of {@code BiMap}.
 *   <dt>{@link Table}

 *   <dt>{@link BiMap}
 *   <dd>An extension of {@link java.util.Map} that guarantees the uniqueness of its values as well
 *       as that of its keys. This is sometimes called an "invertible map," since the restriction on
 *       values enables it to support an {@linkplain BiMap#inverse inverse view} -- which is another
 *       instance of {@code BiMap}.
 *   <dt>{@link Table}

        }
        tasks.named("publishLocalPublicationToLocalRepository") {
            dependsOn("signGradleDistributionPublication")
        }
    }
}

/**
 * Tasks that are called by the (currently separate) promotion build running on CI.
 */
tasks.register("promotionBuild") {
    description = "Build production distros, smoke test them and publish"
    group = "publishing"

   * all of its elements.
   *
   * <p>Modifications to the underlying {@link Iterable} before a call to {@code iterator()} are
   * reflected in the returned iterator. That is, the iterator skips the first {@code numberToSkip}
   * elements that exist when the {@code Iterator} is created, not when {@code skip()} is called.
   *
   * <p>The returned iterable's iterator supports {@code remove()} if the iterator of the underlying

```Python
if not (credentials.username == "stanleyjobson") or not (credentials.password == "swordfish"):
    # Return some error
    ...
```

But by using the `secrets.compare_digest()` it will be secure against a type of attacks called "timing attacks".

### Timing Attacks

But what's a "timing attack"?

Let's imagine some attackers are trying to guess the username and password.

   *     either when the FinalizableReferenceQueue is no longer referenced anywhere, or when its
   *     close() method is called.
   */
  public static void startFinalizer(
      Class<?> finalizableReferenceClass,
      ReferenceQueue<Object> queue,
      PhantomReference<Object> frqReference) {
    /*
     * We use FinalizableReference.class for two things:
     *

the function call.
</p>

<p>
The final case, a value-receiver function for a pointer-receiver method,
is illegal because pointer-receiver methods are not in the method set
of the value type.
</p>

<p>
Function values derived from methods are called with function call syntax;
the receiver is provided as the first argument to the call.

  - New objects inherit the retention settings of the bucket object lock configuration automatically
  - Retention headers can be optionally set while uploading objects
  - Once objects are uploaded PutObjectRetention API can be called to change retention settings
- *MINIO_NTP_SERVER* environment variable can be set to remote NTP server endpoint if system time is not desired for setting retention dates.

## Explore Further

              // we reached EOF
              return new String(buffer, 0, bufIndex);
            }
            // otherwise we got the size wrong.  This can happen if the size changes between when
            // we called sizeIfKnown and when we started reading the file (or I guess if
            // maxCharsPerByte is wrong)
            // Fallback to an incremental approach
            StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder(bufIndex + 32);

   * safe to do so. The exact circumstances under which a copy will or will not be performed are
   * undocumented and subject to change.
   *
   * <p>This method is not type-safe, as it may be called on elements that are not mutually
   * comparable.
   *
   * @throws ClassCastException if the elements are not mutually comparable
   * @throws NullPointerException if any of {@code elements} is null
   */