/**
   * Asserts that the collection under test contains exactly the given elements, respecting
   * cardinality but not order. Subclasses may override this method to provide stronger assertions,
   * e.g., to check ordering in lists, but realize that <strong>unless a test extends {@link
   * com.google.common.collect.testing.testers.AbstractListTester AbstractListTester}, a call to
   * {@code expectContents()} invokes this version</strong>.
   *

        new SynchronousQueue<Object>(),
        new ArrayBlockingQueue<Object>(10),
        new LinkedBlockingDeque<Object>(),
        new LinkedBlockingDeque<Object>(10),
        new PriorityBlockingQueue<Object>(10, Ordering.arbitrary()));
  }

  /*
   * We need to perform operations in a thread pool, even for simple cases, because the queue might
   * be a SynchronousQueue.
   */
  private ExecutorService threadPool;

          // but it would help with some of these lock ordering issues.
          scheduleFailure = e;
          toReturn = new FutureAsCancellable(immediateCancelledFuture());
        } finally {
          lock.unlock();
        }
        // Call notifyFailed outside the lock to avoid lock ordering issues.
        if (scheduleFailure != null) {
          service.notifyFailed(scheduleFailure);

 * invoke methods, they invoke methods on the {@code ForwardingNavigableSet}.
 *
 * <p>Each of the {@code standard} methods uses the set's comparator (or the natural ordering of the
 * elements, if there is no comparator) to test element equality. As a result, if the comparator is
 * not consistent with equals, some of the standard implementations may violate the {@code Set}
 * contract.
 *

    if (!isOrderingCompatible(endpoints)) {
      return false;
    }
    return hasEdgeConnecting(endpoints.nodeU(), endpoints.nodeV());
  }

  /**
   * Throws an IllegalArgumentException if the ordering of {@code endpoints} is not compatible with
   * the directionality of this graph.
   */
  protected final void validateEndpoints(EndpointPair<?> endpoints) {
    checkNotNull(endpoints);

    if (!isOrderingCompatible(endpoints)) {
      return false;
    }
    return hasEdgeConnecting(endpoints.nodeU(), endpoints.nodeV());
  }

  /**
   * Throws an IllegalArgumentException if the ordering of {@code endpoints} is not compatible with
   * the directionality of this graph.
   */
  protected final void validateEndpoints(EndpointPair<?> endpoints) {
    checkNotNull(endpoints);

                .concurrencyLevel(1)
                .ticker(ticker)
                .expireAfterAccess(1, NANOSECONDS));
    Segment<Object, Object> segment = map.segments[0];
    // TODO(fry): check recency ordering

    Object key = new Object();
    int hash = map.hash(key);
    Object value = new Object();
    AtomicReferenceArray<ReferenceEntry<Object, Object>> table = segment.table;

                .concurrencyLevel(1)
                .ticker(ticker)
                .expireAfterAccess(1, NANOSECONDS));
    Segment<Object, Object> segment = map.segments[0];
    // TODO(fry): check recency ordering

    Object key = new Object();
    int hash = map.hash(key);
    Object value = new Object();
    AtomicReferenceArray<ReferenceEntry<Object, Object>> table = segment.table;

        }

        return maximals.getFirst();
    }

    /**
     * Determines which method signature (represented by a class array) is more
     * specific. This defines a partial ordering on the method signatures.
     *
     * @param c1 first signature to compare
     * @param c2 second signature to compare
     * @return MORE_SPECIFIC if c1 is more specific than c2, LESS_SPECIFIC if

   * build-system quirks.
   */
  private @interface GwtTransient {}

  /**
   * Compares strings in natural order except that null comes immediately before a given value. This
   * works better than Ordering.natural().nullsFirst() because, if null comes before all other
   * values, it lies outside the submap/submultiset ranges we test, and the variety of tests that
   * exercise null handling fail on those subcollections.
   */