*
   * @param pattern the pattern on which to filter file names
   */
  public PatternFilenameFilter(Pattern pattern) {
    this.pattern = Preconditions.checkNotNull(pattern);
  }

  /*
   * Our implementation works fine with a null `dir`. However, there's nothing in the documentation
   * of the supertype that suggests that implementations are expected to tolerate null. That said, I

  // such as BoundedQueueExecutorService to allow extends but it would be nice to make it final to
  // avoid unintended usage.

  // The execution list to hold our listeners.
  private final ExecutionList executionList = new ExecutionList();

  /**
   * Creates a {@code ListenableFutureTask} that will upon running, execute the given {@code
   * Callable}.
   *

   * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link
   * Throwable}. But we <i>can</i> write {@code sneakyThrow(t);}.
   *
   * <p>We sometimes also use {@code sneakyThrow} for testing how our code responds to
   * sneaky checked exception.
   *
   * @return never; this method declares a return type of {@link Error} only so that callers can

      @Override
      public @Nullable Object[] toArray() {
        return ObjectArrays.toArrayImpl(this);
      }

      @Override
      @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // b/192354773 in our checker affects toArray declarations
      public <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] toArray(T[] a) {
        return ObjectArrays.toArrayImpl(this, a);
      }

      @Override

    // Optimization - use signed division if dividend < 2^63
    if (dividend >= 0) {
      return dividend / divisor;
    }

    /*
     * Otherwise, approximate the quotient, check, and correct if necessary. Our approximation is
     * guaranteed to be either exact or one less than the correct value. This follows from fact that
     * floor(floor(x)/i) == floor(x/i) for any real x and integer i != 0. The proof is not quite
     * trivial.

// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
@IgnoreJRERequirement // We opt into library desugaring for our tests.
public class CollectionSpliteratorTester<E> extends AbstractCollectionTester<E> {

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = KNOWN_ORDER)
  public void testSpliteratorUnknownOrder() {

   * override subList to return an ImmutableSortedAsList for better performance. Right now, I'm not
   * sure there's any performance hit from our failure to override subListUnchecked under GWT
   */
  @Override
  ImmutableList<E> subListUnchecked(int fromIndex, int toIndex) {
    ImmutableList<E> parentSubList = super.subListUnchecked(fromIndex, toIndex);

    assertThat(converter.reverse().convert(null)).isNull();

    assertEquals((Integer) 5, converter.convert("5"));
    assertThat(converter.reverse().convert(5)).isEqualTo("5");
  }

  // Null-passthrough violates our nullness annotations, so we don't support it under J2KT.
  @J2ktIncompatible
  public void testNullIsPassedThrough() {
    Converter<String, String> nullsArePassed = sillyConverter(false);

        existingValue == null,
        "Duplicate key: (row=%s, column=%s), values: [%s, %s].",
        rowKey,
        columnKey,
        newValue,
        existingValue);
  }

  // redeclare to satisfy our test for b/310253115
  @Override
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible
    abstract Object writeReplace();

public final class EnumBiMap<K extends Enum<K>, V extends Enum<V>> extends AbstractBiMap<K, V> {
  /*
   * J2CL's EnumMap does not need the Class instance, so we can use Object.class instead. (Or we
   * could use null, but that messes with our nullness checking, including under J2KT. We could
   * probably work around it by changing how we annotate the J2CL EnumMap, but that's probably more
   * trouble than just using Object.class.)
   *