throws ArtifactResolutionException {
        fireEvent(ResolutionListener.TEST_ARTIFACT, listeners, node);

        Object key = node.getKey();

        // TODO Does this check need to happen here? Had to add the same call
        // below when we iterate on child nodes -- will that suffice?
        if (managedVersions.containsKey(key)) {
            manageArtifact(node, managedVersions, listeners);
        }

LDAP STS configuration can be performed via MinIO's standard configuration API (i.e. using `mc admin config set/get` commands) or equivalently via environment variables. For brevity we refer to environment variables here.

LDAP is configured via the following environment variables:

```
$ mc admin config set myminio identity_ldap --env
KEY:
identity_ldap  enable LDAP SSO support

ARGS:

   * mutated by the call thread only. If is accessed by background connect threads.
   */
  private val tcpConnectsInFlight = CopyOnWriteArrayList<Plan>()

  /**
   * Results are posted here as they occur. The find job is done when either one plan completes
   * successfully or all plans fail.
   */
  private val connectResults = taskRunner.backend.decorate(LinkedBlockingDeque<ConnectResult>())

        .start();

    Uninterruptibles.awaitUninterruptibly(latch);

    // See Dispatcher.LegacyAsyncDispatcher for an explanation of why there aren't really any
    // useful testable guarantees about the behavior of that dispatcher in a multithreaded
    // environment. Here we simply test that all the expected dispatches happened in some order.

  // to the given dividend, so that we don't have half of our divisions being
  // trivial because the divisor is bigger than the dividend.
  // Using remainder here does not give us a uniform distribution but it should
  // not have a big impact on the measurement.
  private static long randomDivisor(long dividend) {
    long r = randomSource.nextLong();
    if (dividend == -1) {

```Python hl_lines="1"
async def needy_dependency(fresh_value: str = Depends(get_value, use_cache=False)):
    return {"fresh_value": fresh_value}
```

////

## Recap { #recap }

Apart from all the fancy words used here, the **Dependency Injection** system is quite simple.

Just functions that look the same as the *path operation functions*.

  CollectionSize(int numElements) {
    this.implied = emptySet();
    this.numElements = numElements;
  }

  CollectionSize(Feature<? super Collection>... implied) {
    // Keep the order here, so that PerCollectionSizeTestSuiteBuilder
    // gives a predictable order of test suites.
    this.implied = copyToSet(implied);
    this.numElements = null;
  }

  @Override

     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make
     * entrySet().add() tests tolerant of either behavior, introduce a map

 * is a thin wrapper around {@link InetAddresses} and {@link InternetDomainName}; the unit tests for
 * those classes explore numerous corner cases. The intent here is to confirm that everything is
 * wired up properly.
 *
 * @author Craig Berry
 */
@NullUnmarked
public final class HostSpecifierTest extends TestCase {

  private static final ImmutableList<String> GOOD_IPS =

  CollectionSize(int numElements) {
    this.implied = emptySet();
    this.numElements = numElements;
  }

  CollectionSize(Feature<? super Collection>... implied) {
    // Keep the order here, so that PerCollectionSizeTestSuiteBuilder
    // gives a predictable order of test suites.
    this.implied = copyToSet(implied);
    this.numElements = null;
  }

  @Override