/** Exception classes for use in tests. */
@GwtCompatible
final class TestExceptions {
  static final class SomeError extends Error {}

  static final class SomeCheckedException extends Exception {}

  static final class SomeOtherCheckedException extends Exception {}

  static final class YetAnotherCheckedException extends Exception {}

  static final class SomeUncheckedException extends RuntimeException {}

 * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */

/**
 * Provides classes for Maven plugin descriptors that define plugin metadata, configuration,
 * and execution parameters. These descriptors are typically stored in plugin.xml files
 * within the META-INF/maven directory of plugin JARs.
 *

 * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */

/**
 * Provides classes for managing Maven toolchains, which allow projects to use specific
 * tool installations (like JDKs, compilers, or other build tools) across different
 * environments without hardcoding paths.
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */

 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */

/**
 * Implementation of the Maven Upgrade tool ({@code mvnup}).
 *
 * <p>This package contains the implementation classes for the Maven upgrade tool,
 * providing functionality for upgrading Maven projects and dependencies.</p>
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */

    targetCompatibility = "1.8"
  }
}

tasks.withType<KotlinCompile> {
  compilerOptions {
    jvmTarget.set(JvmTarget.JVM_1_8)
    freeCompilerArgs.addAll(
      "-Xjvm-default=all",
      "-Xexpect-actual-classes",
    )
  }
}

extensions.configure<TapmocExtension> {
  // Fail the build if any api dependency exposes incompatible Kotlin metadata, Kotlin stdlib, or Java bytecode version.
  checkDependencies()

In the previous example, because the classes were different, we had to use the `response_model` parameter. But that also means that we don't get the support from the editor and tools checking the function return type.

But in most of the cases where we need to do something like this, we want the model just to **filter/remove** some of the data as in this example.

No exemplo anterior, como as classes eram diferentes, tivemos que usar o parâmetro `response_model`. Mas isso também significa que não temos suporte do editor e das ferramentas verificando o tipo de retorno da função.

Mas na maioria dos casos em que precisamos fazer algo assim, queremos que o modelo apenas **filtre/remova** alguns dados como neste exemplo.

 The following are generated from this model:

   * {{{./apidocs/index.html}Java sources}} with <<<Builder>>> inner classes for immutable instances creation.

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Provides static methods for serializing collection classes.
 *
 * <p>This class assists the implementation of collection classes. Do not use this class to
 * serialize collections that are defined elsewhere.
 *
 * @author Jared Levy
 */
@GwtIncompatible
@J2ktIncompatible
final class Serialization {
  private Serialization() {}

  /**

            // Verify method is inherited
            assertNotNull(AllocInfo.class.getMethod("decode", byte[].class, int.class, int.class));
            assertEquals(int.class, AllocInfo.class.getMethod("decode", byte[].class, int.class, int.class).getReturnType());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should have FileSystemInformation constants accessible")
        void shouldHaveFileSystemInformationConstants() {