SettableFuture<?> unused = SettableFuture.create();
    // Hack to load AbstractFuture et. al. in a new classloader so that it re-reads the cancellation
    // cause system property.  This allows us to run with both settings of the property in one jvm
    // without resorting to even crazier hacks to reset static final boolean fields.
    System.setProperty("guava.concurrent.generate_cancellation_cause", "true");

   * directed; if it is undirected, the added edge will be undirected.
   *
   * <p>If this graph is directed, {@code endpoints} must be ordered.
   *
   * <p>If either or both endpoints are not already present in this graph, this method will silently
   * {@link #addNode(Object) add} each missing endpoint to the graph.
   *
   * @return {@code true} if the graph was modified as a result of this call

 * to the provided {@code standardEquals} method.
 *
 * <p>Each of the {@code standard} methods, where appropriate, use {@link Objects#equals} to test
 * equality for both keys and values. This may not be the desired behavior for map implementations
 * that use non-standard notions of key equality, such as the entry of a {@code SortedMap} whose
 * comparator is not consistent with {@code equals}.
 *

    SettableFuture<?> unused = SettableFuture.create();
    // Hack to load AbstractFuture et. al. in a new classloader so that it re-reads the cancellation
    // cause system property.  This allows us to run with both settings of the property in one jvm
    // without resorting to even crazier hacks to reset static final boolean fields.
    System.setProperty("guava.concurrent.generate_cancellation_cause", "true");

 * directly.  Since the byte‑encoding logic is located in the superclass, the
 * tests verify that the byte buffer created by {@link
 * SmbComQueryInformation#writeBytesWireFormat(byte[], int)} is correctly built
 * for both Unicode and OEM encodings.
 */
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
@MockitoSettings(strictness = Strictness.LENIENT)
class SmbComQueryInformationTest {

    @Mock
    Configuration mockConfig;

        // Create two URLs with the same handler
        URL url1 = new URL(null, "smb://host1/share1", handler);
        URL url2 = new URL(null, "smb://host2/share2", handler);

        // Both should use the same handler instance
        assertNotNull(url1);
        assertNotNull(url2);

        // Protocol should be consistent
        assertEquals(url1.getProtocol(), url2.getProtocol());

Let's say that now the file `main.py` with your **FastAPI** app has some other **path operations**.

It has a `GET` operation that could return an error.

It has a `POST` operation that could return several errors.

Both *path operations* require an `X-Token` header.

//// tab | Python 3.10+

```Python
{!> ../../docs_src/app_testing/app_b_an_py310/main.py!}
```

////

//// tab | Python 3.9+

```Python

// ARMMRCOffset implements the peculiar encoding of the MRC and MCR instructions.
// The difference between MRC and MCR is represented by a bit high in the word, not
// in the usual way by the opcode itself. Asm must use AMRC for both instructions, so
// we return the opcode for MRC so that asm doesn't need to import obj/arm.
func ARMMRCOffset(op obj.As, cond string, x0, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5 int64) (offset int64, op0 obj.As, ok bool) {
	op1 := int64(0)

  public void testRoundToDouble_twoToThe54PlusOne() {
    double twoToThe54 = Math.pow(2, 54);
    // the representable doubles are 2^54 and 2^54 + 4
    // 2^54+1 is less than halfway between, so HALF_DOWN and HALF_UP will both go down.
    new RoundToDoubleTester(BigInteger.valueOf((1L << 54) + 1))
        .setExpectation(twoToThe54, DOWN, FLOOR, HALF_DOWN, HALF_UP, HALF_EVEN)
        .setExpectation(Math.nextUp(twoToThe54), CEILING, UP)

   * has not added {@link AnnotatedType}. That means that we cannot implement that interface in
   * source code in a way that will compile on both Java and Android. If we include the {@code
   * getAnnotatedBounds()} method, then its return type means it won't compile on Android, while if
   * we don't include the method, then the compiler will complain that an abstract method is