*   challenge. In this case the request URL may be different than the initial request URL.
   *
   * Use the `request` of the [networkResponse] field to get the wire-level request that was
   * transmitted. In the case of follow-ups and redirects, also look at the `request` of the
   * [priorResponse] objects, which have its own [priorResponse].
   */

	MOVD	F4, result+16(FP)	// 6460c02b
	MOVF	F4, 1(F5)		// a404402b
	MOVD	F4, 1(F5)		// a404c02b
	MOVW	R4, F5			// 85a41401
	MOVW	F4, R5			// 85b41401
	MOVV	R4, F5			// 85a81401
	MOVV	F4, R5			// 85b81401
	WORD	$74565			// 45230100
	BREAK				// 00002a00
	UNDEF				// 00002a00

	ANDN	R4, R5, R6		// a6901600
	ANDN	R4, R5			// a5901600
	ORN	R4, R5, R6		// a6101600
	ORN	R4, R5			// a5101600

	// mul

func (in *Input) Text() string {
	return in.text
}

// hash processes a # preprocessor directive. It reports whether it completes.
func (in *Input) hash() bool {
	// We have a '#'; it must be followed by a known word (define, include, etc.).
	tok := in.Stack.Next()
	if tok != scanner.Ident {
		in.expectText("expected identifier after '#'")
	}
	if !in.enabled() {

        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableDoubleArray.of(1, 3))
        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableDoubleArray.of(1, 2, 3))
        .testEquals();
  }

  /**
   * This is probably a weird and hacky way to test what we're really trying to test, but hey, it
   * caught a bug.
   */
  public void testTrimmed() {
    ImmutableDoubleArray iia = ImmutableDoubleArray.of(0, 1, 3);

 * were never supposed to be seen on the wire. That assumption was dropped, some say mistakenly, in
 * later RFCs with the apparent aim of making IPv4-to-IPv6 transition simpler.
 *
 * <p>Technically one <i>can</i> create a 128bit IPv6 address with the wire format of a "mapped"
 * address, as shown above, and transmit it in an IPv6 packet header. However, Java's InetAddress

      We could probably have resumed it after https://github.com/google/guava/pull/6664.
      But it's always weird that published poms reference test-only libraries at all, so I'm not in any rush to do so.
      -->
    </dependencies>
  </dependencyManagement>
  <profiles>
    <profile>
        <id>sonatype-oss-release</id>

      We could probably have resumed it after https://github.com/google/guava/pull/6664.
      But it's always weird that published poms reference test-only libraries at all, so I'm not in any rush to do so.
      -->
    </dependencies>
  </dependencyManagement>
  <profiles>
    <profile>
        <id>sonatype-oss-release</id>

		// Add IP/port combo to set. Note that we set Replace to false here - we _did_ previously
		// set it to true, but in theory that could mask weird scenarios where K8S triggers events out of order ->
		// an add(sameIPreused) then delete(originalIP).
		// Which will result in the new pod starting to fail healthchecks.
		//

      implements Serializable {
    private static final AlwaysEqual INSTANCE = new AlwaysEqual();

    @Override
    @SuppressWarnings("UnusedVariable") // intentionally weird Comparator
    public int compare(@Nullable Object o1, @Nullable Object o2) {
      return 0;
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      return "ALWAYS_EQUAL";
    }

        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableIntArray.of(1, 3))
        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableIntArray.of(1, 2, 3))
        .testEquals();
  }

  /**
   * This is probably a weird and hacky way to test what we're really trying to test, but hey, it
   * caught a bug.
   */
  public void testTrimmed() {
    ImmutableIntArray iia = ImmutableIntArray.of(0, 1, 3);
    assertDoesntActuallyTrim(iia);