"database/sql"
	"database/sql/driver"
	"go/ast"
	"reflect"
)

// Expression expression interface
type Expression interface {
	Build(builder Builder)
}

// NegationExpressionBuilder negation expression builder
type NegationExpressionBuilder interface {
	NegationBuild(builder Builder)
}

// Expr raw expression
type Expr struct {
	SQL                string
	Vars               []interface{}
	WithoutParentheses bool
}

)

// EndpointType - enum for endpoint type.
type EndpointType int

const (
	// PathEndpointType - path style endpoint type enum.
	PathEndpointType EndpointType = iota + 1

	// URLEndpointType - URL style endpoint type enum.
	URLEndpointType
)

// ProxyEndpoint - endpoint used for proxy redirects
// See proxyRequest() for details.
type ProxyEndpoint struct {
	Endpoint
	Transport http.RoundTripper

    )
  }

  internal fun formattedType(type: Int): String = if (type < FRAME_NAMES.size) FRAME_NAMES[type] else format("0x%02x", type)

  /**
   * Looks up valid string representing flags from the table. Invalid combinations are represented
   * in binary.
   */
  fun formatFlags(
    type: Int,
    flags: Int,
  ): String {
    if (flags == 0) return ""
    when (type) {

":"{}","version":1,"visState":"{\"title\":\"average-response-time\",\"type\":\"area\",\"params\":{\"type\":\"area\",\"grid\":{\"categoryLines\":false},\"categoryAxes\":[{\"id\":\"CategoryAxis-1\",\"type\":\"category\",\"position\":\"bottom\",\"show\":true,\"style\":{},\"scale\":{\"type\":\"linear\"},\"labels\":{\"show\":true,\"truncate\":100},\"title\":{}}],\"valueAxes\":[{\"id\":\"ValueAxis-1\",\"name\":\"LeftAxis-1\",\"type\":\"value\",\"position\":\"left\",\"show\":true,\"style\":{},\"scale\"...

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code