* reduced the available size of the buffer each time a call to read didn't fill up the available
   * space in the buffer completely. In general this is a performance problem since the buffer size
   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.
   */

   * reduced the available size of the buffer each time a call to read didn't fill up the available
   * space in the buffer completely. In general this is a performance problem since the buffer size
   * is permanently reduced, but with certain Reader implementations it could also cause the buffer
   * size to reach 0, causing an infinite loop.
   */

   * response code like 404 or 500.
   *
   * @throws IOException if the request could not be executed due to cancellation, a connectivity
   *     problem or timeout. Because networks can fail during an exchange, it is possible that the
   *     remote server accepted the request before the failure.
   * @throws IllegalStateException when the call has already been executed.
   */

/// tip | Dica

Integração com outros provedores de autenticação/autorização como Google, Facebook, X (Twitter), GitHub, etc. é bem possível e relativamente fácil.

O problema mais complexo é criar um provedor de autenticação/autorização como eles, mas o FastAPI dá a você ferramentas para fazer isso facilmente, enquanto faz o trabalho pesado para você.

///

## **FastAPI** utilitários

     * The specific problem we had was unsafe reads of lastEntryReturnedBySomeIterator. (To fix the
     * problem, we've since marked that field as volatile.)
     *
     * When MapIteratorCache is used from Immutable* classes, the TSAN failure doesn't indicate a
     * real problem: The Entry objects are ImmutableMap entries, whose fields are all final and thus

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[16] *}

Immer wenn jetzt ein Browser einen Benutzer mit Passwort erzeugt, gibt die API dasselbe Passwort in der Response zurück.

Hier ist das möglicherweise kein Problem, da es derselbe Benutzer ist, der das Passwort sendet.

Aber wenn wir dasselbe Modell für eine andere *Pfadoperation* verwenden, könnten wir das Passwort dieses Benutzers zu jedem Client schicken.

/// danger | Gefahr

  - type: textarea
    id: code-to-reproduce
    attributes:
      label: Standalone code to reproduce the issue
      description: Provide a reproducible test case that is the bare minimum necessary to generate the problem. Please share a link to Colab, Jupyter, or any notebook.
      placeholder: Tell us what you see!
      value:
      render: shell
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: logs

Natürlich gibt es Fälle, in denen es kein Problem darstellt, die Vorab-Schritte mehrmals auszuführen. In diesem Fall ist die Handhabung viel einfacher.

/// tip | Tipp

Sie sind jedoch nicht auf die Verwendung von bestimmten Datenmodellen, Klassen, oder Typen beschränkt.

Möchten Sie eine `id` und eine `email` und keinen `username` in Ihrem Modell haben? Kein Problem. Sie können dieselben Tools verwenden.

Möchten Sie nur ein `str` haben? Oder nur ein `dict`? Oder direkt eine Instanz eines Modells einer Datenbank-Klasse? Es funktioniert alles auf die gleiche Weise.

E se o seu servidor remoto ou máquina virtual tiver apenas 3 GB de RAM, tentar carregar mais de 4 GB de RAM causará problemas. 🚨

### Processos Múltiplos - Um Exemplo

Neste exemplo, há um **Processo Gerenciador** que inicia e controla dois **Processos de Trabalhadores**.