// but it would help with some of these lock ordering issues.
          scheduleFailure = e;
          toReturn = new FutureAsCancellable(immediateCancelledFuture());
        } finally {
          lock.unlock();
        }
        // Call notifyFailed outside the lock to avoid lock ordering issues.
        if (scheduleFailure != null) {
          service.notifyFailed(scheduleFailure);

        private boolean done = false;
        private boolean throwOnFetch;
        private boolean throwOnCloseInternal;

        // Use static factory method to work around constructor ordering
        static TestIterator create(SmbTreeHandleImpl th, SmbResource parent, String wildcard, ResourceNameFilter filter,
                int searchAttributes, FileEntry initial, List<FileEntry[]> pages) throws CIFSException {

 *
 * <p>If there are no removals, then iteration order for the {@link #entrySet}, {@link #keySet}, and
 * {@link #values} views is the same as insertion order. Any removal invalidates any ordering
 * guarantees.
 *
 * <p>This class should not be assumed to be universally superior to {@code java.util.HashMap}.
 * Generally speaking, this class reduces object allocation and memory consumption at the price of

        assertTrue(s.contains(Arrays.toString(mechs)), "toString should include mechanisms");
        assertTrue(s.contains("000AFF"), "toString should include MIC hex");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Mechanism ordering is preserved after parse")
    void testMechanismOrderPreserved() throws Exception {
        ASN1ObjectIdentifier[] mechs = new ASN1ObjectIdentifier[] { OID_NTLM, OID_KRB, OID_KRB_LEGACY };

    return insertionOrder;
  }

  /**
   * Compares strings in natural order except that null comes immediately before a given value. This
   * works better than Ordering.natural().nullsFirst() because, if null comes before all other
   * values, it lies outside the submap/submultiset ranges we test, and the variety of tests that
   * exercise null handling fail on those subcollections.
   */

      return buildOrThrow();
    }

    private ImmutableMap<K, V> build(boolean throwIfDuplicateKeys) {
      if (valueComparator != null) {
        Collections.sort(
            entries, Ordering.from(valueComparator).onResultOf(Maps.<V>valueFunction()));
      }
      return fromEntryList(throwIfDuplicateKeys, entries);
    }

    public ImmutableMap<K, V> buildOrThrow() {

   * iterables are equivalent to one another.
   *
   * <p>Note that this method performs a similar function for equivalences as {@link
   * com.google.common.collect.Ordering#lexicographical} does for orderings.
   *
   * <p>The returned object is serializable if this object is serializable.
   *
   * @since 10.0
   */
  public final <S extends @Nullable T> Equivalence<Iterable<S>> pairwise() {

                if (result < 0 || (result == 0 && (!lowerBoundInclusive || !upperBoundInclusive))) {
                    throw new InvalidVersionSpecificationException("Range defies version ordering: " + spec);
                }
            }

            restriction = new Restriction(lowerVersion, lowerBoundInclusive, upperVersion, upperBoundInclusive);
        }

        return restriction;
    }

import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableMultimap;
import com.google.common.collect.Iterables;
import com.google.common.collect.Multiset;
import com.google.common.collect.Ordering;
import com.google.common.primitives.Chars;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;

@RunWith(JUnit4.class)

import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableMultimap;
import com.google.common.collect.Iterables;
import com.google.common.collect.Multiset;
import com.google.common.collect.Ordering;
import com.google.common.primitives.Chars;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.JUnit4;

@RunWith(JUnit4.class)