}
        final Matcher matcher = getTagPattern().matcher(input);
        final StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer();
        final Pattern attrPattern = Pattern.compile("\\s[^ ]+=\"([^\"]*)\"");
        while (matcher.find()) {
            final String tagStr = matcher.group();
            final Matcher attrMatcher = attrPattern.matcher(tagStr);

	for pattern := range rules {
		if wildcard.MatchSimple(pattern, objectName) {
			return true
		}
	}
	return false
}

// Match - returns TargetIDSet matching object name in rules.
func (rules Rules) Match(objectName string) TargetIDSet {
	targetIDs := NewTargetIDSet()

	for pattern, targetIDSet := range rules {
		if wildcard.MatchSimple(pattern, objectName) {

  //   where the endpoint is located. This should match the corresponding
  //   node label.
  // * topology.kubernetes.io/zone: the value indicates the zone where the
  //   endpoint is located. This should match the corresponding node label.
  // * topology.kubernetes.io/region: the value indicates the region where the
  //   endpoint is located. This should match the corresponding node label.

}

// ResourcePolicyRule is a predicate that matches some resource
// requests, testing the request's verb and the target resource. A
// ResourcePolicyRule matches a resource request if and only if: (a)
// at least one member of verbs matches the request, (b) at least one
// member of apiGroups matches the request, (c) at least one member of
// resources matches the request, and (d) either (d1) the request does

 * error message template strings. This only supports the {@code "%s"} specifier, not the full range
 * of {@link java.util.Formatter} specifiers. However, note that if the number of arguments does not
 * match the number of occurrences of {@code "%s"} in the format string, {@code Verify} will still
 * behave as expected, and will still include all argument values in the error message; the message

Author: Harshavardhana <******@****.***>
Date:   Sat Jun 15 11:27:17 2019 -0700

    [security] Match ${aws:username} exactly instead of prefix match (#7791)

    This PR fixes a security issue where an IAM user based
    on his policy is granted more privileges than restricted
    by the users IAM policy.

    This is due to an issue of prefix based Matcher() function
    which was incorrectly matching prefix based on resource

 * error message template strings. This only supports the {@code "%s"} specifier, not the full range
 * of {@link java.util.Formatter} specifiers. However, note that if the number of arguments does not
 * match the number of occurrences of {@code "%s"} in the format string, {@code Verify} will still
 * behave as expected, and will still include all argument values in the error message; the message

        {
            "detail": [
                {
                    "type": "string_pattern_mismatch",
                    "loc": ["query", "q"],
                    "msg": "String should match pattern '^fixedquery$'",
                    "input": "nonregexquery",
                    "ctx": {"pattern": "^fixedquery$"},
                }
            ]
        }
    ) | IsDict(

    bitSet.clear(0);
    bitSet.clear(1);
    matcher = useNew ? CharMatcher.whitespace() : OLD_WHITESPACE;
    teststring = newTestString(new Random(1), bitSet, percentMatching);
  }

  @Benchmark
  public int countIn(int reps) {
    int result = 0;
    CharMatcher matcher = this.matcher;
    String teststring = this.teststring;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {
      result += matcher.countIn(teststring);
    }
    return result;

    bitSet.clear(0);
    bitSet.clear(1);
    matcher = useNew ? CharMatcher.whitespace() : OLD_WHITESPACE;
    teststring = newTestString(new Random(1), bitSet, percentMatching);
  }

  @Benchmark
  public int countIn(int reps) {
    int result = 0;
    CharMatcher matcher = this.matcher;
    String teststring = this.teststring;
    for (int i = 0; i < reps; i++) {
      result += matcher.countIn(teststring);
    }
    return result;